It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register please click here...

Go Back [M] > Madshrimps > WebNews
ATI and NVIDIA Proclaim Different Graphics Processors Architecture Goals ATI and NVIDIA Proclaim Different Graphics Processors Architecture Goals
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

ATI and NVIDIA Proclaim Different Graphics Processors Architecture Goals
Thread Tools
Old 23rd December 2004, 16:50   #1
jmke's Avatar
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,021
jmke has disabled reputation
Default ATI and NVIDIA Proclaim Different Graphics Processors Architecture Goals

While particular approaches in graphics processing units design have been pretty different for leading computer visual companies ATI Technologies and NVIDIA Corp., in future the architecture of GPUs from the firms may be fundamentally different, as executives from both companies proclaim different approaches for chip internal architectures.

NVIDIA Disagrees with ATI Technologies

ATI Technologies’ developer relations manager Richard Huddy said last month during a conference in London, UK, that the company’s future visual processing units will feature unified pixel and shader processing. While he declined to elaborate on the timeframes for such chips, he said unified pixel and vertex data processing is a required capability for Windows Graphics Foundation 2.0 that comes our together with Microsoft’s next-generation operating system called Windows Longhorn. On of the benefits the unified approach brings is ability to dynamically allocate chip resources depending on the demand for pixel and vertex processing, Mr. Huddy said. Another one is simplified software development.

NVIDIA Corp.’s chief architect David Kirk called the unified graphics engines as an implementation detail, not a feature, but admitted the unified architecture would be nice for programmers, who would have one instruction set for vertex and pixel shaders.

“It’s not clear to me that an architecture for a good, efficient, and fast vertex shader is the same as the architecture for a good and fast pixel shader. A pixel shader would need far, far more texture math performance and read bandwidth than an optimized vertex shader. So, if you used that pixel shader to do vertex shading, most of the hardware would be idle, most of the time. Which is better – a lean and mean optimized vertex shader and a lean and mean optimized pixel shader or two less-efficient hybrid shaders? There is an old saying: ‘Jack of all trades, master of none’,” Mr. Kirk said in an interview with ExtremeTech web-site.

more @
jmke is offline   Reply With Quote

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ATI, Nvidia to Cut Prices on Graphics Cards jmke WebNews 0 17th November 2008 16:59
Nvidia GeForce GTX 200 Graphics Architecture Review jmke WebNews 0 5th August 2008 10:28
ATI, Nvidia Condemn 3D Graphics Benchmarks, Again jmke WebNews 1 21st June 2007 09:20
ATI, Nvidia Plan to Flood the Market with Cheap DirectX 10 Graphics Cards jmke WebNews 0 2nd May 2007 13:24
NVIDIA and ATI HDCP Compatible Graphics Cards Roundup jmke WebNews 0 17th November 2006 08:04
ATI And NVIDIA Graphics Cards In Video Decoding Tasks jmke WebNews 0 3rd November 2006 07:51
Professional Graphics Accelerators of Today: ATI vs. Nvidia jmke WebNews 0 27th May 2006 14:12
Choosing a graphics card, ATI or Nvidia year end guide Sidney WebNews 0 20th December 2004 16:38
EverCool VGA Heat Pipe Universal ATI & Nvidia graphics cards heatsinks jmke WebNews 0 3rd November 2004 15:01

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:33.

Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO