| ||Thread Tools|
|10th June 2005, 15:54||#1|
Join Date: Mar 2004
Apple switches, adopts the Intel x86 architecture
For decades Apple has been bad mouthing the x86 architecture until they announced this week they'll be using Intel's x86 processors in their upcoming products. Surprised? We take a closer look.
Opteron 165 (2) @2.85 1.42 vcore AMD Stock HSF + Chill Vent II
|11th June 2005, 00:30||#4|
Join Date: May 2002
and IBM has proven that they are stuck at the current speeds, so I think it's wise from Apple to go with the best offer. Intel has the factories and resources to deliver tailor mate Apple-ready CPU's.
it's not because the hardware changes, that Apple is now "" ; Apple is about SOFTWARE, if they keep up the original and "cool" OS side, they'll have buyers.
same as their Ipod series, which is basically the same as any other HDD mp3 player..
|11th June 2005, 08:56||#5|
Well, Apple first worked with Motorola, but they couldn't meet the demands, that's why they went to IBM.
Now, about using AGP cards, IDE drives: they only did much later, to lower costs.
But frankly, if they had to go x86, I would have prefered AMD. Not cos of the rivality between AMD and Intel, just because AMD already worked with IBM on similar technologies (SOI, stretched silicon...).
Well, the world can't be perfect
I hope one thing will remain though: the quality. Except for the Ipod Shuffle, and maybe other examples I don't know, Apple did a great job concerning the build quality of their products.
|11th June 2005, 11:50||#6|
Yes I would have prefered AMD too.
There was a remark that AMD wouldn't be able to meet Apple's volume demands.
Come on! Apple has a tiny percentage of the market. If AMD can't cover even that then they should get their head out of their *** and built another factory, because look what it has costed them already: a huge deal that would make them true rivals to Intel and not the (almost) niche enthusiast market specialists they are now.
|11th June 2005, 16:02||#7|
Some interesting things to read:
One thing I don't understand:
|11th June 2005, 16:08||#8|
Join Date: Jun 2002
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|Nokia works with Intel on custom x86 silicon, to ditch TI/ARM?||jmke||WebNews||0||16th February 2010 17:43|
|Apple ditches 32nm Arrandale, won't use Intel graphics||jmke||WebNews||0||5th December 2009 12:44|
|Intel Architecture Driving Future of Supercomputing||jmke||WebNews||0||16th November 2009 14:26|
|Intel next generation architecture “LGA 1366” platform - GIGABYTE X58-EXTREME||windwithme||General Madness - System Building Advice||0||1st September 2008 16:13|
|Intel to move to common CPU architecture||Sidney||WebNews||5||23rd August 2005 21:27|
|Intel Pentium 4 Developer Kit for Apple Adored by Software Makers.||jmke||WebNews||0||7th June 2005 23:08|
|Apple to Move to Intel Processors in 2006||Sidney||WebNews||0||7th June 2005 02:38|
|Apple will switch to X86 processors - AMD?||Sidney||WebNews||7||6th June 2005 00:27|
|Apple may use Intel chips: report||Sidney||WebNews||0||23rd May 2005 19:37|
|Intel Helps to Develop 64-bit Software for x86||jmke||WebNews||0||6th October 2004 10:57|