| Thread Tools |
19th December 2012, 08:03 | #1 |
[M] Reviewer Join Date: May 2010 Location: Romania
Posts: 148,597
| Apple fails to get Samsung injunction Apple's attempts to get its rival banned from the US have failed. After it convinced a jury that Samsung had nicked its glorious rounded rectangle, Apple had expected that Judge Lucy Koh would award it a permanent injunction against Samsung products in the US. This is particularly since the jury ordered Samsung to write a cheque for a billion dollars. However Koh, said no and killed off any chance that Apple has of winning the mobile patent wars. Apple had convinced Koh to impose two pretrial sales bans against Samsung, one against the Galaxy Tab 10.1, and the other against the Galaxy Nexus phone. After the trail it asked Koh to impose a permanent sales ban against 26 mostly older Samsung phones. The injunction could have been extended to Samsung's newer Galaxy products. But, according to Reuters, one of the problems was that the jury cleared Samsung on the patent used to ban Galaxy Tab 10.1 sales, so Koh rescinded that injunction. But what was more crucial was that a federal appeals court reversed Koh's ban against the Nexus phone. Koh cited the ruling as a binding legal precedent and said that Apple had not presented enough evidence that its patented features drove consumer demand for the entire iPhone. She pointed out that the phones contain a range of features, only a small fraction of which are covered by Apple's patents. While Apple did have some interest in retaining certain features as exclusive to Apple, entire products can't be banned from the market because they incorporate a few narrow protected functions. However on the plus side for Apple, Koh rejected a bid by Samsung for a new trial based on an allegation that the jury foreman was improperly biased in favour of Apple. The ruling leaves Apple's cunning plan to patent troll its rivals from business rather than offering better products in a mess. To succeed in this plan it has to have products banned from the shelves to force Samsung either to pay ridiculous patent fees, or give up. http://news.techeye.net/mobile/apple...ung-injunction |
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Apple Wants $3B in Damages From Samsung | Stefan Mileschin | WebNews | 0 | 20th September 2012 08:48 |
Judge decides against lifting US injunction on Samsung's Galaxy Tab 10.1, for now | Stefan Mileschin | WebNews | 0 | 18th September 2012 08:26 |
Apple forced to say sorry to Samsung | Stefan Mileschin | WebNews | 0 | 20th July 2012 06:22 |
Samsung kicks Apple in the Netherlands | Stefan Mileschin | WebNews | 0 | 22nd June 2012 07:26 |
Apple denied stateside Galaxy S III injunction | Stefan Mileschin | WebNews | 0 | 14th June 2012 07:37 |
Apple gets another bite, wins appeal to pursue preliminary injunction against Samsung | Stefan Mileschin | WebNews | 0 | 15th May 2012 06:32 |
Brazil Files Injunction Against Twitter | Stefan Mileschin | WebNews | 0 | 13th February 2012 08:26 |
Apple loses against Samsung down-under | Stefan Mileschin | WebNews | 0 | 2nd December 2011 09:57 |
Samsung to File Injunction Against Apple for iPhone 4S | Stefan Mileschin | WebNews | 0 | 6th October 2011 07:15 |
AMD worms out of injunction on building new HQ | jmke | WebNews | 1 | 12th April 2006 19:24 |
Thread Tools | |
| |