It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register please click here...

Go Back [M] > Madshrimps > WebNews
Apple gets another bite, wins appeal to pursue preliminary injunction against Samsung Apple gets another bite, wins appeal to pursue preliminary injunction against Samsung
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Apple gets another bite, wins appeal to pursue preliminary injunction against Samsung
Thread Tools
Old 15th May 2012, 07:32   #1
[M] Reviewer
Stefan Mileschin's Avatar
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Romania
Posts: 138,412
Stefan Mileschin Freshly Registered
Default Apple gets another bite, wins appeal to pursue preliminary injunction against Samsung

We'll forgive you if you've forgotten, given the myriad Apple/Samsung legal shenanigans, but back in February, Apple attempted to obtain a preliminary injunction against Samsung to prevent the Galaxy Tab 10.1 and a few phones from being sold in the US. Samsung emerged victorious, as the district court denied Cupertino's request because it questioned the validity of a couple of Apple's patents and didn't see how Apple would be irreparably harmed if it failed to get Sammy's products banned. Naturally, Tim Cook's crew appealed that decision, and the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) has decided to give Apple another crack at obtaining an injunction. The CAFC upheld the lower court's ruling as to three of the four patents, but found fault with the District Court's holding that Apple's tablet design patent had substantial questions of validity.

Essentially, the lower court held that Apple's patent was likely no good because it was an obvious design in light of two tablets that were created long before Apple patented the iPad's look. However, the CAFC found that one of the previous slate's asymmetrical bezel and lack of an unbroken, all-glass surface (among other differences) were sufficient to render Apple's patent non-obvious. Basically, the appellate court found that the District court "construed the claimed design too broadly," and remanded the issue so that the district court could complete its preliminary injunction analysis. So, Apple's cleared a big hurdle towards getting the Galaxy Tab 10.1 off the US market, but the company's still got to persuade Judge Koh that it'll be irreparably harmed without the injunction. This decision assures even longer legal proceedings, but given how well both of these tech titans are doing these days, we're pretty sure they can afford the attorneys' fees.
Stefan Mileschin is offline   Reply With Quote

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Motorola Wins Sales Injunction in Germany Against Windows 7 and Xbox 360 Stefan Mileschin WebNews 0 3rd May 2012 08:57
ASUS Transformer TF101 finally receives ICS update, Taiwan takes the first bite Stefan Mileschin WebNews 0 24th February 2012 07:46
Brazil Files Injunction Against Twitter Stefan Mileschin WebNews 0 13th February 2012 09:26
Apple loses against Samsung down-under Stefan Mileschin WebNews 0 2nd December 2011 10:57
Samsung to File Injunction Against Apple for iPhone 4S Stefan Mileschin WebNews 0 6th October 2011 08:15
Psystar loses appeal in battle with Apple, told to ditch Mac clones for-ev-ver Stefan Mileschin WebNews 0 30th September 2011 09:12
Apple Now Using Samsung SSDs in MacBook Air? jmke WebNews 0 18th April 2011 15:44
Rambus Continues to Pursue PC Graphics Market with XDR2 jmke WebNews 0 3rd May 2006 11:53
AMD worms out of injunction on building new HQ jmke WebNews 1 12th April 2006 20:24
ATI fanbois pursue Nvidia's maths jmke WebNews 1 10th February 2006 20:08

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 16:53.

Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2022, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO