It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register please click here...

 
Go Back [M] > Madshrimps > WebNews
AMD Radeon HD 6850 and 6870 3DMark Performance Numbers AMD Radeon HD 6850 and 6870 3DMark Performance Numbers
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


AMD Radeon HD 6850 and 6870 3DMark Performance Numbers
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 9th October 2010, 12:35   #1
Madshrimp
 
jmke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,002
jmke has disabled reputation
Default AMD Radeon HD 6850 and 6870 3DMark Performance Numbers

A lucky person in China got his hands on two of AMD's upcoming video cards, he ran 3DMark06 and 3DMark Vantage using the test setup details below:

CPU:i7 940 2.93G CPU: i7 940 2.93G
Motherboard: X58 (Gigabyte)
DDR3 1066 6GB (7-7-7-19) Memory: DDR3 1066 6GB (7-7-7-19)


The cards tested were:

HD6870
Core frequency: 900
Memory Frequency: 4200
Number of stream processors: 960
3DMark Vantage: P16270 & X7538
3DMark06: 19480

HD6850
Core frequency: 775
Memory Frequency: 4000
Number of stream processors: 800
3DMark Vantage: P14872 & X6549
3DMark06: 18750

if we put these numbers in perspective, the future is looking bright, knowing that HD 6870 is to replace HD 5770 and HD 6850 the HD 5750.


*Obtained on Stefan's Core i7 920@3.2Ghz test setup


- translated source
Attached Thumbnails
amd-radeon-hd-6850-6870-3dmark-performance-numbers-clipboard01.jpg amd-radeon-hd-6850-6870-3dmark-performance-numbers-clipboard02.png
__________________

Last edited by jmke : 9th October 2010 at 12:44.
jmke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th October 2010, 13:43   #2
K404
 
Posts: n/a
Default

20% increase in SP, ~5% increase in core MHz..... 15% increase in score. It's not looking *that* good.... it implies there's no optimisations going on, just a raw increase in SP.

15% increase in performance is still nice of course, but will probably be 15% more expensive than a 5770 to start with....

AMD back on a red PCB?


Will this be the 2010 equivalent of the 4890?

Last edited by K404 : 9th October 2010 at 15:08.
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th October 2010, 15:40   #3
[M] Reviewer
 
Stefan Mileschin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Romania
Posts: 128,982
Stefan Mileschin Freshly Registered
Default

I wonder what drivers he used for the cards
Stefan Mileschin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th October 2010, 18:31   #4
Oberon
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Remember, AMD is supposed to be going to a 4 shader design instead of the old 4 simple + 1 complex design, so shader numbers can't be directly compared. The best comparison we have here is the 5770 to 6850; you've got the "same" number of shaders and the 6850 comes in at roughly a 10% clockspeed deficit, but scores roughly 10% higher in 3D06. That's a nice little improvement.

*EDIT* Of course, this is just if the testbeds are comparable. Either way, I won't exactly be disappointed if these numbers are correct.

Last edited by Oberon : 9th October 2010 at 18:35.
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:59.


Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO