It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register please click here...

 
Go Back [M] > Madshrimps > WebNews
AMD chips edge ahead of Intel AMD chips edge ahead of Intel
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


AMD chips edge ahead of Intel
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 26th August 2004, 07:47   #1
[M] Reviewer
 
Sidney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 15,739
Sidney Freshly Registered
Default AMD chips edge ahead of Intel

Published: August 24, 2004, 10:35 AM PDT
By Matt Loney
Special to CNET News.com


Advanced Micro Devices' top-end desktop processors are faster than Intel's for most applications, according to benchmarks from ZDNet Germany's labs.

In a test, Intel's Pentium 4 560 running at 3.6GHz and of the 3.4GHz Pentium 4 550 failed to outperform alternatives from AMD. The Pentiums, both with the new Prescott core and 1MB of onboard Level 2 cache, were pitted against the Athlon 64 3800+ running at 2.4GHz and the 2.2GHz 3500+.

The benchmarks indicated the Athlon 64 has an advantage in office and Internet applications, and with 3D games, said Kai Schmerer, the senior editor who conducted the tests in ZDNet Germany's labs.

But AMD's processors did not come top in all tests. "The Pentium 4 scored with optimized software--particularly 3D and video rendering," Schmerer said. "The multitasking tests also show an advantage for Intel's Pentium 4."

In Winstone benchmark tests, which measure performance in business and content creation tasks such as converting video files or delivering a PowerPoint presentation, the AMD chips were 10 to 16 percent faster than the Intel ones. But with multitasking switched on to take advantage of Intel's Hyperthreading technology, the Intel chips took up the lead by 9 percent.

Overall, the test results tended to favor AMD's chips for mainstream applications. That's a potential challenge for Intel, given that the AMD parts are cheaper and cooler. The 3800+ chip consumes 91watts of power at idle, rising to 172 watts under a full load. That compares with 155 watts at idle and 258 watts under a full load for the Pentium 4 560.

The lower power consumption of the AMD parts arises from their lower clock frequency, as well as from AMD's use of Silicon-on-Insulator (SOI) technology.

AMD's 64-bit chips also support the NX (No Execute) feature, which safeguards them from certain virus attacks. (Intel has announced that the Pentium 4 is to support the NX feature later this year.)
http://cbs.marketwatch.com/discussio...58&msgId=24338
__________________
lazyman

Opteron 165 (2) @2.85 1.42 vcore AMD Stock HSF + Chill Vent II
Sidney is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AMD launches chipset for Intel chips jmke WebNews 1 19th February 2007 19:33
AMD has a response to Intel Woodcrest server chips jmke WebNews 0 24th February 2006 10:20
Intel claims that upcoming Conroe and Merom Chips deliver 20% speed boost over AMD jmke WebNews 0 18th February 2006 17:28
AMD, Intel unwrap their latest server chips Sidney WebNews 0 7th February 2006 07:04
Intel Gets Ready to Leap Ahead: Changes Logo, Motto jmke WebNews 0 3rd January 2006 00:24
AMD edges ahead of Intel in Office Benchmarks jmke WebNews 0 25th August 2004 12:23
AMD Targets to Counter Strike Intel with Dual-Core Chips in 2005 jmke WebNews 0 23rd May 2004 10:50

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 22:12.


Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO