It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register please click here...

 
Go Back [M] > Madshrimps > WebNews
AMD Athlon FX-60 vs. X2 3800+ - Game Performance Compared AMD Athlon FX-60 vs. X2 3800+ - Game Performance Compared
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


  



Other Recent News
ECS C19-A SLI nForce4 SLI Intel Edition Motherboard
Game executive plays real-life Grand Theft Auto

Similar Stories
AMD GAME! Enables Console-like Simplicity for Mainstream PCs
AMD Introduces ‘AMD Business Class’, Designed With Business in Mind
AMD Launches World’s First x86 Triple-Core Processors
High Performance AMD Phenom™ X4 Processors Lead the Charge to HD Desktop Gaming and V
AMD Rewrites the Rules for Notebook Performance
  
AMD Athlon FX-60 vs. X2 3800+ - Game Performance Compared


 
Thread Tools
10th April 2006, 21:10 [jmke] - #1
AMD Athlon FX-60 vs. X2 3800+ - Game Performance Compared

Today we are going to compare the FX-60 and X2 3800+ against each other. We know now that the FX-60 is going to be the faster processor but what we want to have a look at how much extra performance we get, from such an expensive processor. We are going to be purely looking at graphics card performance and why you might ask? The answer to that is easy, because 90% of the time when we test a high-end card, the complaints attack these articles as to why we are using a $300 processor on a $1200 graphics card setup
10th April 2006, 21:10 [jmke] - #2
Default

without reading the article I'm guessing the CPU inpact is very little to overall game performance

Quote:
We knew from the word go that the AMD Athlon FX-60 was going to be the faster processor but so it should be at $700 more. The FX-60 is a great gaming processor but the chances are you already know this. What we wanted to look at was how the FX-60 compared against our test bench CPU. At most we see performance increases of 25% with a performance increase of 10% to 15% being more common.
do note that they're using very high end graphics cards; if you use anything less extreme the impact will be <10%
10th April 2006, 21:29 [Sidney] - #3
Default

<19" monitor, no need for high end CPU or GPU
>30" monitor get the best of both, right?
10th April 2006, 21:39 [jmke] - #4
Default

for 30" you need super duper resolutions, 1600x1200 doesn't quite cut it, when you go higher you will be severly GPU limited
Closed Thread

Thread Tools



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:15.


Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO