| Thread Tools |
12th October 2006, 09:11 | #1 |
Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,022
| Ageia PhysX RealityMark Tested While we applaud that they are attempting to show off the strengths of the hardware, a performance difference this vast with a dual core CPU even this strong is more alarming on their point for bias than something that supports the strengths of the PhysX hardware. In other words, more marketing fluff than anything substantial. We hope Ageia spends more time supporting game developers and finding better uses of their PhysX processors than time spent on a benchmark like this, which is not likely to generate support in the hardware community.
__________________ |
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Nvidia Ends Support for AGEIA PhysX Processors | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 5th May 2010 14:38 |
Dark Void: Physx Shooter tested - GTX 260-216 as dedicated Physx card recommended | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 19th January 2010 09:57 |
NVIDIA's PhysX Tested with Upcoming Game Titles | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 6th August 2008 14:51 |
Ageia Goes Green: The Future of Ageia PhysX Discussed | jmke | WebNews | 3 | 8th February 2008 12:31 |
Ageia PhysX | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 18th May 2007 10:46 |
AGEIA RealityMark Released | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 10th October 2006 21:28 |
AGEIA™ PhysX by BFG Tested | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 16th May 2006 12:35 |
Ageia PhysX & You | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 7th May 2006 23:27 |
ASUS AGEIA PhysX Hardware Tested | jmke | WebNews | 1 | 5th May 2006 09:28 |
AGEIA Misses Guidance: PhysX Processor May Be Delayed. | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 29th November 2005 23:05 |
Thread Tools | |
| |