The Senile Doctor

that's exactly same result as I have, about 22k 3dmarks
(but my install is two years old)

quake is no heavy benchmark any more

even serious sam 2 runs perfectly smooth at 1600*1200 *max detail * 6*aa (!) and 16*qual af...at 75-80 fps mean

__________________
OC-2-the-death
Where the Reverend is doing his Magick, all mortals be silent
Doom over the world

jmke

then do the same with CoD

1280*1024 with 2*aa and 2xaf

20-30fps

max detail




you'll need to run a custom demo benchmark, one that is more taxing

__________________

The Senile Doctor

but cod ain't two years old!


and what you're saying is actually quite incorrect... i get over 100 fps mean on COD when playing 1280*1024 and 4*aa and 16 *af,max detail, four times more than what you say.

even hardocp on a standard 9800 xt and a p4 3.2 (being 350 mhz cpu and 85 mhz gpu-core/ 70 mhz gpumem slower then my rig) gets 85 fps mean on these settings COD. lickie

__________________
OC-2-the-death
Where the Reverend is doing his Magick, all mortals be silent
Doom over the world

jmke

Stalingrad,
getting of the boat after it has been destroyed, looking up to the mountain= 20-30fps


not making it up, cpu is indeed a bit less, (2.4c + 1gb ram) but that doesn't count for 85 vs 20 fps

screenie

__________________

IKilledMyAGOIA

im guess that the engine wasnt designed to hand that high AA/AF and so no matter how fast your hardware is, the code can only process it all to a certain point before it lags

The Senile Doctor

possible...

__________________
OC-2-the-death
Where the Reverend is doing his Magick, all mortals be silent
Doom over the world