It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register please click here...

Go Back [M] > Hardware Madness > Hardware Overclocking and Case Modding
Different HS "paste" Different HS "paste"
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Different HS "paste"
Closed Thread
Thread Tools
Old 17th May 2009, 00:23   #1
Posts: n/a
Default Different HS "paste"

This might not be as crazy as it first sounds.

"Pure" gold is very very soft.
Couple mil thick gold foil, 1" square should cost less than $10. Conductivity should be about 75% of pure silver, but higher than most silver filled pastes. About the same as Arctic Silver 5.

Purer grades should be soft enough to conform to surface imperfections.

Silver foil would have higher thermal conductivity but may suffer from increase in thermal impedance at silver-heat shink and silver-cpu interfaces because of oxidation.

Is this too crazy even to think about trying a foild instead of a paste?

Any heat sink guru out there feel like trying it?
Old 17th May 2009, 01:08   #2
jmke's Avatar
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 78,847
jmke has disabled reputation

the possible increase in conductivity is not worth the cost; even now the difference between cheapo paste and expensive after market is only a few degrees at best. if you can manage to squeeze another C out of your HSF with gold paste it would be a lot
jmke is offline  
Old 17th May 2009, 09:13   #3
[M] Reviewer
leeghoofd's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,192
leeghoofd Fully Registeredleeghoofd Fully Registeredleeghoofd Fully Registeredleeghoofd Fully Registeredleeghoofd Fully Registeredleeghoofd Fully Registeredleeghoofd Fully Registeredleeghoofd Fully Registered

I agree with Jmke, the cost is not worth the expected small gain...

You also have to verify if your IHS and Cooling block are 100% flat. If there's already a small deviation (concave, convex) not even "gold" will do it
leeghoofd is offline  
Old 17th May 2009, 15:19   #4
Posts: n/a

Good point on the flatness.
Good point on how big the gain is...I was thinking in terms of reducing the interface thermal impedance by maybe up to a factor of 2. This sounds good, thus my post.

But if you do the math even a very hot OC CPU with proper thickness on the best thermal paste has temp drop over the paste of only 2 deg max. So twice as good is not much. Its the diminishing returns scenario.

Thanks for setting me straight.
Closed Thread

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 20:37.

Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO