| ||Thread Tools|
|8th July 2005, 14:08||#1|
Eastern OC Expert
Join Date: Dec 2004
AMD Athlon64 X2 4800+ Dual Core Basic Test
Many days passed after post FX57 and 4600+.
Windwithme shows you AMD Athlon64 X2 4800+.
The AMD top version of dual core, 2.4G 1MB cache.
Lets look back the pictures it takes with FX57.
They are the 2 most hi-end CPU.
AMD Athlon64 X2 4800+ 2.4G 1MB
DFI nF4 LANParty SLI
Sunnystone new water cooler + dual fan heat pipe + Eheim 1250 motor
This time I used Sunnystone water cooler and DFI nF4. The temperature shows correctly.
The room temperature shows 33 degree C, and 27 degree C under air condition.
In default setting, 2.4G 1MB cache, the voltage is only 1.26V.
Only run SUPER PI and CPUMARK, they are not dual core supported. The performance is the same level with 4000+ and FX53 2.4G 1MB single core.
OC to 2.7G in 1.36V, one of the core is worse.
PS: Then I found in SP2004 both select CPU0, and the CPU utilization is 100%.
SP2004 modify to CPU0 and CPU1, the result is the same, the CPU utilization is 100% but another core cannot run long time.
But 1.36V 2.7G SUPER PI 32M finished.
Lets test dual core CPU supported graphics software next.
Single core 2.7G 1MB is 68.9 seconds
Dual core2.7G 1MB is 36.8 seconds
What¡¦s the next item to test?
The cheapest dual core CPU 4200+?!
Today my home has a new air conditioner. It makes my mood great..........
|8th July 2005, 15:21||#2|
Join Date: Mar 2004
Did you get my email?
Opteron 165 (2) @2.85 1.42 vcore AMD Stock HSF + Chill Vent II
|9th July 2005, 05:39||#7|
Join Date: May 2002
Location: wherever the doom is
windwith me just wants to put anything to 9*300, that's all he wants
Where the Reverend is doing his Magick, all mortals be silent
Doom over the world
|9th July 2005, 15:41||#8|
I bet that if they'd make a 1.8gig X2, it would still do about 2.7gig on the same V
|9th July 2005, 18:37||#9|
I may remind you that the late low end Winchester cores didn't clock all that well compared to the first ones.
Seing as the 4800 doesn't overclock that much, it could very well be that they have sufficent bad clockers to deliver a low end X2. For the normal user, it doesn't matter anyway.
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|AMD Launches 45nm Triple Core Phenom II with DDR3 support||jmke||WebNews||0||9th February 2009 09:26|
|AMD dual core problem on WIn XP x64||fmolina||Hardware/Software Problems, Bugs||3||29th October 2007 13:26|
|AMD to Drop Single Core CPUs and Cut Dual core Prices on Monday||jmke||WebNews||4||8th July 2007 22:31|
|Dual Core Battle : Intel Wolfdale vs AMD Antares||jmke||WebNews||0||11th October 2006 21:52|
|[Tk] AMD Opteron 165 Dual Core (S939, 1,8GHz, 2MB, Boxed)||Vassili||Mad Bargains||0||30th March 2006 17:23|
|Dual Core Done Right : AMD’s Athlon64 X2 Processors||Sidney||WebNews||0||16th July 2005 08:14|
|AMD Athlon64 X2 Dual Core 4200+||Sidney||WebNews||0||13th June 2005 23:15|
|AMD challanges validity of Intel Dual Core||Liquid3D||WebNews||13||3rd June 2005 23:10|
|Microsoft endorses AMD lead in dual core plans||Sidney||WebNews||0||18th May 2005 04:58|
|AMD launching dual core Athlons tomorrow||Sidney||WebNews||0||20th April 2005 22:43|