Madshrimps Forum Madness

Madshrimps Forum Madness (https://www.madshrimps.be/vbulletin/)
-   Articles & Howto's (https://www.madshrimps.be/vbulletin/f6/)
-   -   ...request a product (p)review (https://www.madshrimps.be/vbulletin/f6/request-product-p-review-3383/)

jmke 3rd February 2007 14:09

we have some coverage of the bad axe here: mostly OC related though :)
http://www.madshrimps.be/?action=get...&articID=4 70

thorgal 3rd February 2007 21:57

Quote:

Originally Posted by jmke (Post 139409)
Hey KTMitch, my pleasure, one of our reviewers (Thorgal) got a bad axe rev 2, I'll ask him to post some comment on it, he's had the Bad Axe rev1 and few other Core 2 boards to 'play' with.

Right J., here I am.

If you want me to pick one out of the two boards you present, KTMitch, I'd take the Bad Axe 2 at the moment.

I have liked abit boards a lot in the past, that is in socket A and socket 478 times. Right now, they're rapidly climbing to top notch performance again, but they're in my humble opinion not quite there. AW9-max is an excellent board across the line, especially for Conroe clocking, but it is has some major shortcomings for quad core performance : it has rather bad front side bus performance, and it cannot change mulitpliers the correct way (it changes only the multi of one of the two dies).

Bad Axe have come a long way, and the second bad axe board is a great leap forward on the first one. Not only did Intel fix the quad core performance (it is, after the P5B-deluxe, the best quad core board out there), but they made the bios and tweaking options far more accessible, and provide it out of the box (you had to perform a warranty voiding mod on the bad axe 1). Drawback of both bad axes is that you have to be patient with them : they sometimes react weird, and you have to put your time in them. On the other hand, when the board is stable, it's stable. Whatever you throw at it.

Lastly, when you ask me what I think is the best board at this moment, I wouldn't taken any of these two, but the Asus P5B-deluxe. Unless you absolutely need SLI or crossfire, this is definately the board to go for. The new Asus Commander should be even better, but I'd wait some more months, to let the biosses mature a little. Alternatively, I've heard many good things of the new Gygabyte revision of the DS3, I bleive it's called the DS3P. And last but not least, I still have to put my hands on a RD600 board to test, but that could be another contestant. I'd definately stay away from 680i boards for the moment, and wait for a second revision...

KTMitch 3rd February 2007 22:42

Thanks for the link, jmke. But soldering a motherboard scares me a bit.

Wow, thanks for the in-depth answer, thorgal. I don't see myself going quad-core any time soon, however. Unless I won one . . . Same thing for SLI or crossfire. As far as patience with either of the boards, that won't be a problem in my situation.

I’ve looked at the P5B-deluxe before. It seems to be a fairly solid board. The one thing that turned me away from it (and what attracted me to the AW9D-MAX) is the onboard audio. While, yes, onboard audio generally isn't desirable, my thought was to wait until Creative (or Microsoft) fixed the sound card processing issues with Vista while using onboard audio during the wait. Many of the reviews on Newegg speak about the very bad performance from the onboard audio on the P5B-Deluxe. What is your experience with this?

In light of my interest on moderate performance from the onboard audio, what board would you suggest? Or would it simply be better to spend some extra money and get an audio card or an external DAC?

One thing I also have noticed with many of the motherboard reviews is the incompatibility with certain RAM brands. What RAM 'plays nice' with these motherboards?

The care for your readers on Madshrimp amazes me. I’ve never gotten such quick and knowledgeable answers from any other website.

jmke 4th February 2007 08:07

I started out with Creative Live! cards, then when I made the switch to Audigy 2, I lost faith a bit, as the Creative drivers would lock up my NF3 based system every time, no fix provided by Creative... since then I'm using onboard sound on all mainboards I tested/used, would not say that they're bad, you'd have to have a pretty high end sound setup to notice a difference, and that difference is not big to begin with:)

the CPU performance impact of onboard sound is measurable, if you run a game at 640x480, which causes other things than the videocard to be the bottleneck, in such a case you'll see that the dedicated soundcard gives you more FPS. Now if you increase in-game detail to normal levels, the difference between the two audio solutions will be practically nihil. Current CPUs are more than powerful enough to take care of a few audio processing commands.

concerning memory incompatibility, if you stick with larger name brands and take the product line meant for the Core 2 platform, you're pretty safe + fact that all these enthusiast minded memory companies have pretty decent RMA, so if it doesn't work with your setup, an email or two later you'll be on your way to getting a new working pair. If you ordered in a local shop, you can just drop by to them out:)

KTMitch 4th February 2007 13:15

I have an Audigy 2 currently. I find the audio quality to be okay, but not ground-breaking. My problem is just that, however, I have audiophile rated equipment. It’s an older system, but the quality is still through the roof by today's standards. While neither an onboard audio processor nor even an internal sound card is the best option, I simply cannot justify the extreme prices for an external DAC.

I myself have never used onboard audio before, so I have no experience with it. But you guys have convinced me to give the P5B-D major consideration. A review on it would be great!

Okay, I have some more suggestions for reviews if you are interested.

OCZ GameXStream OCZ600GXSSLI http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16817341001. The public seems to like this one, but how does it perform in terms of noise output and heat generation?

ENERMAX Liberty ELT500AWT http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16817194003. Yet again, many people suggest this one, but what about heat and noise?

Also, what wattage is needed in a power supply to drive a 8800GTS?

A write-up on modular PSU's would be nice. The community seems to be split in half whether it is a good idea or a bad idea.

I was also wondering about the number of SATA cables for the Corsair HX 520w & 620W Power Supplies.

Something else that might be beneficial to people shopping for computer parts would be a store guide. Most people in the computer sphere know about Newegg or TigerDirect, but so many of the smaller online stores are lost in the mix. Yesterday, I just found XBStore.com. The prices there are absolutely amazing. Core 2 Duo E6600 for $208, eVGA 8800 GTS for $260. The only catch is that all orders must be above $650. Now, I've never heard of XB Store until yesterday, and I cannot find any reviews or comments about using it. I'm not sure whether it is a great deal, or if I'll be scammed (by insane shipping, long processing time, order not going through, etc.). A store review section on MadShrimp would be great!

Rutar 4th February 2007 14:29

As much as I believe in a limited catalogue to reduce costs, I do not think 100$ less the newegg price is posssible.


google says I'm right:

http://www.techsupportforum.com/secu...store-com.html

http://www.epinions.com/msg/show_~th.../forum_id_~146

http://forums.cnet.com/5208-7596_102...geID=238775 9

KTMitch 4th February 2007 14:42

Thanks for the links, Rutar. I never found those links when I did some background checks on XBstore. It was almost too good of a deal to be true.

This cements my idea (at least in my mind). It would be very useful if a shopper could look at reviews of online stores on Madshrimp. It would help eliminate people getting scammed, and give them a good idea of what sites are safe (and preferred). While this would get away from computer component reviews, it would cover the second half of the computer building process (the actual buying).

RobertM 22nd May 2007 02:06

Asus P5NT-WS
 
I'm about to purchase all I need for my first build, and feel confident in my choices except fot the mobo. I'll be picking up a QX-6800, 4GB Corsair XMS2 8500 or 9136, BFG 8800 OC2, Galaxy DXX 1000W, 3 WD HD's, (1 Raptor boot, 2 RE2 Raid Edition, set for Raid 2), XP 64, TJ09.

I'll be working with some of the gaming editors as well as Maya and 3DMax which is why I want a good gaming system, but my primary use will be serious digital photography with Photoshop, Painter etc.

Stability is much more important to me than FPS, but I'm hoping with some of the newer offerings, I can have both. I almost picked up the Asus P5W64 WS Pro, but I think the newer workstation boards may now be offering more features and better perfomance. ???

The new P5NT-WS has PCI-X structure, 1333 Fsb, 3 PCIe x16 supporting SLI and has solid aluminum capacitors, RealTek Audio.
It seems to offer a lot, but as I said, I'm inexperienced so am unsure if this mobo is my best option. I would like a 680i for the features but am unwilling to chance being saddled with instability issues I'm unable to troubleshoot and fix.
It would be great to have your thoughts on this board or other options too...Asus P5K3 Delux???

Thanks!!!

RobertM :)

kwaksalver 29th May 2007 21:24

I would very much like a review of Lian Li PC-71 case! Haven't seen it anywhere on the inet yet :'(

Things I want to know is if you can play with the HDD holder on the bottem of the case, if you can turn in around or move it anywhere else easely without de-attaching it.

Also a good look of what you get exactly would be kewl, since I need to know if the included ventilators are silent enough etc!

thorgal 29th May 2007 21:48

Quote:

Originally Posted by kwaksalver (Post 145531)
I would very much like a review of Lian Li PC-71 case! Haven't seen it anywhere on the inet yet :'(

Things I want to know is if you can play with the HDD holder on the bottem of the case, if you can turn in around or move it anywhere else easely without de-attaching it.

Also a good look of what you get exactly would be kewl, since I need to know if the included ventilators are silent enough etc!

The PC71 is actually already quite old, and exactly the same as the PC70 (but black instead of silver).

here is a review of the PC70 (from 2k01 already).

FYI, I've got a PC70 for everyday use, and replaced the 4 included 80mm fans because they weren't quite quiet enough...

Rutar 18th August 2007 11:28

http://www.antazone.com/page/products-1.html

I totally want a review of that thing considering they sell it at Ninia/Mugen/U120 price level.

iluvgillgill 14th September 2007 16:05

Ultimate Cooling?
 
Scythe Infinity with quad fan configuration.Have hear of it but can't find any review of it.different configuration:Dual push and pull,1 push and pull with 2 at the side blowin inward,all blowin inward.

Looking forware to it.

thorgal 14th September 2007 16:09

Quote:

Originally Posted by iluvgillgill (Post 155692)
Scythe Infinity with quad fan configuration.Have hear of it but can't find any review of it.different configuration:Dual push and pull,1 push and pull with 2 at the side blowin inward,all blowin inward.

Looking forware to it.

This is a custom configuration I guess.

Have you seen our Infinity mod article ?

iluvgillgill 16th September 2007 23:37

yeah i have seen that mod review.but i wanted to know what will be the actual performance differences with quad fan configuration.it would be great is you can review and try it out.because i heard its possible on the net but couldn't find any actual review for it.

KaOSoFt 16th January 2008 02:38

Hello there.

I'm new to this forum, but I've been reading MadShrimps reviews for a while. Pretty nice they are.

I read the "120mm Fan Roundup: 17 Fans Compared" article and I felt quite impressed by the professional work put into it. Now, while I think there's a good amount of pretty nice fans, I'd like to know if there is a way that you, jmke, could include a Noctua NF-P12 into the test. I've read awesome reviews about this fan, giving it a high score, but unfortunately, I have yet to see a comparison against, let's say, a Scythe S-FLEX SFF21F (which is my most ambitious and possible buy). I'm mainly aiming at performance-per-decibel results. :-p

Other things I've been looking for is a heatsink-with-certain-fan specific test. I'm looking forward to see how do the Thermalright Ultra-120 eXtreme or the Thermalright Ultima-90 perform, specially the latest, which I really prefer over the eXtreme, because I'm always afraid that giant and heavy heatsinks could break my poor motherboard. I know it shouldn't happen under normal circumstances, but still... :bloos: In push-pull configuration as well. I've read the Noctua has a higher static pressure, so I'd love to see some testing results, including noise testing. :)

Why I'm begging for this test? Because I cannot get either fan in my country; I have to order them for a little higher cost (+15%), so it's a tough decision for me, given that I already spent most of my money in my current equipment (check my signature, and don't worry, I still have some bucks for food and maybe sleeping... heh, just joking). I can afford two units of any of the two, but I want to get the best. :naughty:

Thank you for providing us with such a nice reviews. I'm expecting much more from you. ;-)

PS: Sorry if I look like demanding something... well, yeah, I'M EAGER TO KNOW THE ANSWER TO MY QUESTIONS...! :ws:

jmke 16th January 2008 08:52

Noctua NF-P12 is being tested right now;)

Ultra-120 eXtreme soon too, keep you eye on the site;)

Rutar 25th March 2008 11:19

I want to know how the new Noctua fan NF-P12 stacks up against the silent eagle, because it seems that they startet thinking about the blades:

http://www.barrys-rigs-n-reviews.com...e/nf-p12/2.htm

jmke 25th March 2008 11:37

massive 120mm roundup is in the pipeline:)

woodykipo 9th April 2008 18:12

review of the NZXT Lexa Blackline Case and NZXT Tempest case(NZXT names it "the airflow king",so it could be good competition for the Antec 900 and I couldn't find any reviews about this case!).

jmke 9th April 2008 19:12

thank you for your post Woodykipo, the Lexa we tested here: http://www.madshrimps.be/gotoartik.php?articID=376 the Blackline only change is color as far as I can see.


the Tempest ( http://www.nzxt.com/products/tempest/ ) does look like a contender for best cooling, mimics cooling design of Antec 900 :)

Pardons 13th April 2008 12:56

A DDR3 roundup on both X38,X48 and if possible 790I would be cool :)
To see the differences in games,applics and ofcourse termse of overclocking.

geoffrey 13th April 2008 13:38

We do have a DDR3 roundup coming up: http://www.madshrimps.be/vbulletin/f...-coming-43429/

Test on every available chipset would require lot's of time and I don't know if the reviewer has all these boards available for tests. Massman has been testing different boards too, in terms of overclocking he might come up with quite an interesting review/article :)

Pardons 13th April 2008 13:58

Quote:

Originally Posted by geoffrey (Post 168028)
We do have a DDR3 roundup coming up: http://www.madshrimps.be/vbulletin/f...-coming-43429/

Test on every available chipset would require lot's of time and I don't know if the reviewer has all these boards available for tests. Massman has been testing different boards too, in terms of overclocking he might come up with quite an interesting review/article :)

Time shouldn't be a problem right every review requires time already.

The affects in current benches would be cool already ^^

geoffrey 13th April 2008 14:22

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pardons (Post 168029)
Time shouldn't be a problem right every review requires time already.

Writing articles and reviews is still our hobby, not our job, we have another job and off course a family to care about :) Our articles require a lot of dedication and free time, don't underestimate that. We can do a DDR3 roundup, we can do a motherboard roundup, heck, we can make roundup of about anything, but both at the same time will get the reviewer busy for few months, that's efficiency close to 0. With only few active reviewers we can't afford this at the moment.

Everything helps though, anybody out there who thinks he has written something interesting, a product review maybe, may contact John and if all goes well your stuff might hit our main site.

EDIT: you do remember our articles which state that the performance of current memory modules don't add too much up to the total system performance: http://www.madshrimps.be/?action=getarticle&articID=472

jmke 13th April 2008 18:37

the question is to find motherboard capable of the speeds DDR3 is offering, no board runs at 1800Mhz yet memory exists, but its easier said then done to find a mobo that does the job

Pardons 13th April 2008 19:42

Quote:

Originally Posted by jmke (Post 168038)
the question is to find motherboard capable of the speeds DDR3 is offering, no board runs at 1800Mhz yet memory exists, but its easier said then done to find a mobo that does the job

yeah i have no clue also really, ddr3 seems to be rushed to me though?

w1ng3dkn1ght 16th April 2008 12:20

Review This Geforce 8500GT
 
Can you guys review this Geforce 8500GT

MSI NX8500GT-TD256E OC GeForce 8500GT 256MB 128-bit GDDR3 PCI Express x16 SLI Supported Video Card - Retail,

I would like it to be tested with COD4 most likely, Thx guys!

The Card is on Newegg. Sorry can't give link the site won't let me

jmke 16th April 2008 12:36

8500GT DDR3 will run COD4 at 1024x768 medium details at "ok" framerate; the OC version will give you slightly higher performance. but not much.
While I did no test COD4, I know Oblivion is harder on GFX then COD4, if it can run Oblivion, it can run COD4;)
http://www.madshrimps.be/?action=get...&articID=6 14


do note that the 9500GT is close to launch it will be at price <$80 for sure, and offer better performance then 8500GT and 8600GTS(most likely)

w1ng3dkn1ght 16th April 2008 17:06

Oh okay, so COD4 on All High Settings should run okay also? at 1024x768. Also when do the 9500GT's Come out?

jmke 16th April 2008 17:07

You can try HQ but suggest Medium Quality;
no release date yet for 9500 GT... summer time most likely

w1ng3dkn1ght 16th April 2008 17:15

Okay thx for your help, the reason I asked if its playable all on high is because i've seen people with the 8500GT, and were able to max everything out on COD4 and barely get any lag at 1024x768

jmke 16th April 2008 17:37

it's possible, COD4 engine is very "easy" on hardware compared to other recent titles like Crysis :)

With 8600GT I could run COD4 at High Detail 1280x1024
http://www.madshrimps.be/?action=get...&articID= 630

so 8500GT should be able to handle +/- same FPS at 1024x768

geoffrey 16th April 2008 18:03

8500GT running COD4: http://www.madshrimps.be/?action=get...&articID=6 42

COD 1/2 should be no problem.

jmke 16th April 2008 18:07

ah cool:) 57 average FPS, you can take it to the HIGH setting:)

w1ng3dkn1ght 17th April 2008 16:00

Jmke 57 FPS Average all on high? if so then very nice!

jmke 17th April 2008 16:04

check the link Geoffrey posted;) http://www.madshrimps.be/?action=get...&articID=6 42
avg 57 is with medium setting, so high setting will be between 35-50 most likely

w1ng3dkn1ght 17th April 2008 16:11

Ahh, then with some overclocking... It should be all good!

jmke 17th April 2008 16:13

for sure, just look at that XFX edition sour at 91 FPS:)

w1ng3dkn1ght 17th April 2008 16:38

Okay, Now that thats over can you review this motherboard

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16813157125

jmke 17th April 2008 17:32

that's an older board for sure, onboard 6 series VGA will not be worth much in today's games


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:03.

Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO