conversely -

When using DDR2 (M2) with low Vdimm and high Vcore will the outcome be similar?

After all, this might not be a difficult fix for AMD should they listen to the Overclockers.

any proof of that failure claim?

President to VP on a 1:1 ratio without 3rd party is the key. The job of a Secretary is no longer the same as what people preceived 20 years ago;) Toilet is used by humans only.

The Processor should incorporate the N/S bridge to become "bridgeless" and "more effective".

As far as writing an article on the subject, I can't make a comment because I don't have enough knowledge on electronics, especially in micro-electronics.:)

Two weeks of use, 1:1 HTT/Memory ratio is now back; 2xPrimestable. The old school of thought, burn-in still means something. TCCD is back in business doing what it does best ;)

TCCD doesnt like burn in

it's not the TCCD that is being "burned in".. look at thread title for a hint ;)

ha, lol, my mistake

After three weeks of use, vcore now dropped to 1.475 at BIOS with 2xPrime stable @2.62 Ghz

CPU0 is the weak one; CPU1 could reach 2.7Ghz using 1.525 vcore.

and how do you know what cpu does what? :)

Setting affinity to pick which core to run;)