AMD Barton XP3000+
 

here are the others

http://www.anandtech.com/cpu/showdoc.html?i=1783
http://www.deviantpc.com/reviews/barton3000/index.shtml
http://www.motherboards.org/articles...ws/1232_1.html
http://www.tomshardware.com/cpu/20030210/index.html
http://www.aceshardware.com/read.jsp?id=50000364
http://www.lostcircuits.com/cpu/amd_xp3000+/
http://www.simhq.com/simhq3/hardware...00/index.shtml
http://tech-report.com/reviews/2003q...0/index.x?pg=1
http://www.hardwarezone.com/articles...?cid=2&aid=628
http://www.bit-tech.net/review/180/
http://www.sudhian.com/showdocs.cfm?aid=324
http://www.amdmb.com/article-display.php?ArticleID=224

if you find more, feel free to post!

vs



??

Anandtech also shows the Intel as being faster...

intel is and will always be faster at quake3...
the midscreen is probably some ****eduptesting.

however, if you watch all the test, the ONLY conclusion you can take is that for gamers they are equally good, the differences are marginal...

taking ut2k3 screens is more interesting...

you told me something else last time :)

I know... but my p4 was at 3 ghz with ****ed up drivers... and the athlon was at 2400 mhz (3400+ :) ) so there's your difference...


this leaves me with the same problem... I want to change the gaming rig, coz it's gettin' old and I don't know what to buy...

"getting old" -my ***

n/o but not 1 game out there uses the power you have currently
save a buck & be smart :)

Owkay.
that's what I'll do. :)

waiting for springdale anywayz.

Which is your gaming rig? amd or intel?

And how about the PSU you asked me for?

his gaming rig in his room is his P4
but he has played UT on his work PC (AMD) and found it to be much faster