Madshrimps Forum Madness - 3ghz 800FSB P4 is here

Madshrimps Forum Madness (https://www.madshrimps.be/vbulletin/)

- General Madness - System Building Advice (https://www.madshrimps.be/vbulletin/f18/)

- - 3ghz 800FSB P4 is here (https://www.madshrimps.be/vbulletin/f18/3ghz-800fsb-p4-here-1951/)

hmm

that sucks

however, if you haven't signed it...
you simply don't pay for it...

and canterwood/ p4 will be better now
@ richyB : I'll check my 3.06 with the prommy on this asus canterwood, and I'll see how it performs... if it sux, I sell the 3.06 and go for a 3.0

gotta get me two raptors too...
and a new rma-d 120 gb WD as data backup as I'm downing tons of movies :)

let the shop fight it out with our sucky belgian mail "service" :)

Quote:

Originally posted by Zinzin
Belgian post doesn't like german packages ???

I receive one or two packages from .de every week. I have had no bad experiences yet.

I phoned the German postoffice, they know it's in Belgium.

They change the packagenumber when it arrives in Belgium ???
so, go figure how can they track it.....

I'm not used to wait for something :)

If you buy something outside Belgium, ask them to ship with UPS.
Never got problems with UPS :)

it's back at the shop, don't know what happend.
pff, P4C800 here I come :p

Intel + Dual DDR power

Quote:

Since our i875P-Canterwood-Review of Monday letzer week reach us many letters by email and also some forum contributions, where for the Overclocking possibilities of the new chip set ask user. Mainly with around the possibility, 533 are a MHz processor on 800 MHz to over clocks - there this however within the specifications of the chip set lies, can quite confirm one the possibility - here is the limit rather because of the processor.

Many questions are occupied however with the over clock bar of 800 MHz processors. This new CPUs finally already possesses an extremely high front Side bus - with a firm multiplicator therefore naturally a Overclocking over FSB is to be classified riskily. Encouraged of our reports of news of the Soltek Springdale Mainboard with 1200 MHz come then however the dreams to perhaps lure a Pentium 4 on this frequency.

We have therefore a Canterwood Mainboard - which ASUS P4C800 Deluxe - for a test with 800 MHz a processor equipped and this over-clocks, in order to test, which FSB is reached. Came out the following results:

A bus clock of 325 MHz results due to the QDR bus of the Pentium 4 into an effective front Side bus of nevertheless 1300 MHz - that is even still more, than Soltek in the proud press release communicates. Of course this frequency no more cannot be driven with a synchronous storing act - with 1300 MHz DDR650 would be necessary. We had the storing act two times to therefore lower - altogether here the Setting "DDR266" is used, we operates the memory thus with a 2/3-Teiler. Effectively this results in a frequency of 216.66 MHz, which corresponds to DDR433

It can be doubted also here whether the Canterwood limits the system - dual DDR433 is already for a system a challenge. With better memory - we used Corsair XMS3200LL-Speichermodule - can be reached here possibly also still more, because a 1/2-divisor for the RAM does not possess the Canterwood unfortunately.

Who wants thus with the i875P-Chipsatz over clocks, the following should consider:

With our short test we knew the chip set around 62,5% over clocks. That is for most Pentium 4-Prozessoren somewhat much - even with very high tension and good cooling one will not be able a 3.0C-Prozessor on the resulting 4.875 Ghz over clocks. A over clocking within this range appears thus as improbable - even if one reaches outstanding 4 Ghz, must the Canterwood only around 33% be over-clocked - in this case is thus enough a FSB of 266 MHz and/or. 1066 MHz perfectly out.

The large problem with over clocks with the i875P is the memory interface. DDR400 is actually already synchronous at the limit, would like one the memory interface clocks, then one will be already quite fast at the end, even if DDR466 or similarly luxurioeser memory is used. One over-clocks asynchronously, then high bus clocks can be quite reached.

About own experience reports we are pleased naturally in the forum.

3.0 is underway for me, i should have it wednesday

coupled with the asus p4c800 that's installed allready :)

http://www.tomshardware.com/mainboar...429/index.html
Our tests show that the old Intel 7205 chipset runs stably with a new P4 processor at an FSB clock of 200 MHz. This raises the question of what advantages the new high-end 875 chipset really has over the old 7205. Moreover, in the benchmarks, the two chipsets give about the same results.

http://www.ocworkbench.com/2003/othe...4800/page1.htm
Both processors, AMD Barton XP3000+ (400) and the Intel Pentium 4 3.0G (800) has excellent performance in various categories. In fact, in most of the tests, the P4 leads the way. Well, this can be due to a number of reasons like a better chipset which is optimised for HT and multimedia applications.