Madshrimps Forum Madness

Madshrimps Forum Madness (https://www.madshrimps.be/vbulletin/)
-   Hardware Overclocking and Case Modding (https://www.madshrimps.be/vbulletin/f10/)
-   -   Troman's 7300GT worklog (https://www.madshrimps.be/vbulletin/f10/troman-s-7300gt-worklog-34308/)

Pardons 21st June 2007 13:05

Troman's 7300GT worklog
 
deleted

jmke 21st June 2007 14:14

GPU clocks @ stock?

duploxxx 21st June 2007 14:27

Nice amount of duct tape you are using |D|D

Pardons 21st June 2007 14:55

500/1500 according to coolbits :)

jmke 21st June 2007 15:23

interesting score, wonder if A64 @ 3ghz is that much faster than C2D@2.4Ghz

duploxxx 21st June 2007 15:42

Quote:

Originally Posted by jmke (Post 146760)
interesting score, wonder if A64 @ 3ghz is that much faster than C2D@2.4Ghz

jmke, we know that already for a year that k8 is much faster than a c2d (except in the reviews), but people are still buying those cripple micro-architecture pieces :nutkick:

btw just started and already troubles with those drivers. newest don't recognise the card like you told us, the supplied drivers are crashing on my intel system :mad:

Teemto 21st June 2007 17:25

My wife's system is A64 3700+:naughty: so I'll make a comparison with my E6420:love: on sunday.

geoffrey 21st June 2007 18:17

Nice headstart Troman, +50% compared to JMke

Gamer 21st June 2007 18:18

Yeah, looks like we have a wiener :)

thorgal 21st June 2007 20:02

Impossible results if you ask me, you a cheater steven :p :D

No seriously, stock here on C2D LOD enabled is about 90fps, same as jmke by the way. Your score seems a little "strange"...

Pardons 21st June 2007 20:07

Quote:

Originally Posted by thorgal (Post 146845)
Impossible results if you ask me, you a cheater steven :p :D

No seriously, stock here on C2D LOD enabled is about 90fps, same as jmke by the way. Your score seems a little "strange"...

serious?
Stock cpu 2.4ghz AM2
This is at 645 core rofl? +10fps?
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=9218067

easypanic 21st June 2007 20:08

3013MHz, too bad :p

Pardons 21st June 2007 20:11

this is a rerun stock at 2.4ghz cpu and 500/750(1500?)

http://users.telenet.be/kuan/screenie.JPG

roughly 140fps :D

blind_ripper 21st June 2007 20:17

ur turn bro ;)

thorgal 21st June 2007 20:18

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pardons (Post 146850)
this is a rerun stock at 2.4ghz cpu and 500/750(1500?)

http://users.telenet.be/kuan/screenie.JPG

roughly 140fps :D

Impressive, what can I say... Still don't understand, but hey, your little secret :naughty:

Pardons 21st June 2007 20:26

yes indeed nice card to play/tweak with :)
At 2.4ghz cpu while i have 3000mhz to play with, and clocks mentioned in screenie...

http://users.telenet.be/kuan/176.JPG

jmke 21st June 2007 20:27

Quote:

Originally Posted by thorgal (Post 146845)
Impossible results if you ask me, you a cheater steven :p :D

No seriously, stock here on C2D LOD enabled is about 90fps, same as jmke by the way. Your score seems a little "strange"...

http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y90...contest169.jpg

weird indeed, let's wait for more scores:) no way some software tweaks account for double/triple scores:)
must be my config:) eens OS reinstallen

Pardons 21st June 2007 20:38

Quote:

Originally Posted by jmke (Post 146855)
http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y90...contest169.jpg

weird indeed, let's wait for more scores:) no way some software tweaks account for double/triple scores:)
must be my config:) eens OS reinstallen

I'm sure there are plenty of settings wich you might forgot to alter :)

my OS is Windows Xp pro sp2.0 i believe :)

jmke 21st June 2007 20:39

I have a new goal:) beat you stock score :D

Gamer 21st June 2007 21:10

never mind, getting old :)

blind_ripper 21st June 2007 21:59

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gamer (Post 146878)
I get the same score as John here, what are we doing wrong ?
stock : 139 fps
for contest : 57 fps

Am I missing something here ?

yes that we are heavy tweakers , troman u used NVHP allready ?
hhhmmm u are right about the typhoon mount , no X800 mounting holes on this card :( .
k then we are making a new sink from a old alluminum AMD heat sink , yes the same one i used last year for that sick nature run ;) .
1.3cm base :D

jmke 21st June 2007 22:04

"we are heavy tweakers" doesn't make software run 100FPS faster:) any tweaker knows that :D

blind_ripper 21st June 2007 22:14

Quote:

Originally Posted by jmke (Post 146885)
"we are heavy tweakers" doesn't make software run 100FPS faster:) any tweaker knows that :D

zucht : uw basis tweak's vergeten ?
LOD / driver settings ;) , de rest is zelf zoeken zu .
strange uh why i and troman can go this fast this easy and u guys ar so slow :D

Gamer 21st June 2007 22:19

nah, it's easy m8 :)

jmke 21st June 2007 22:19

"u guys" is atm "/me" and my single setup. Gamer is up there with you guys:)
others will follow.

LOD tweak gives 5~10FPS boost; not 100FPS:)

Pardons 22nd June 2007 14:27

Quote:

Originally Posted by blind_ripper (Post 146882)
yes that we are heavy tweakers , troman u used NVHP allready ?
hhhmmm u are right about the typhoon mount , no X800 mounting holes on this card :( .
k then we are making a new sink from a old alluminum AMD heat sink , yes the same one i used last year for that sick nature run ;) .
1.3cm base :D

The same heatsink i use :)

Pardons 27th June 2007 09:31

765/880
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=9220607


btw are the reading points for vgpu for sure correct?:D

Gamer 27th June 2007 09:31

Hardmod ?

Pardons 27th June 2007 09:33

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gamer (Post 147608)
Hardmod ?

ah yes, used a 20K VR :)

btw do you have teh Vmem mod? :D

Gamer 27th June 2007 09:38

Nope, card is still unmodded.

Pardons 27th June 2007 10:06



hmm card scales wel with low volts ...low volts = ironic meant..

yes indeed teh meme flatts out at 880 LOL

blind_ripper 27th June 2007 10:09

pardons same thing u guy's asked me what voltage :D

Massman 27th June 2007 10:12

Good run, what drivers? :D

Pardons 27th June 2007 10:16

Quote:

Originally Posted by blind_ripper (Post 147622)
pardons same thing u guy's asked me what voltage :D

Lol i know that you know the answer on that LOL

:D

massman i'm trying every driver out there. and besides a bugged run with one differences are only noticeable in max clock speeds :D

Pardons 27th June 2007 10:32

820 on the core

Massman 27th June 2007 11:16

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pardons (Post 147626)
Lol i know that you know the answer on that LOL

:D

massman i'm trying every driver out there. and besides a bugged run with one differences are only noticeable in max clock speeds :D

Any chance on those beneath 93.71?

I tried the 84.21, but never got those installed as the driver didn't support the 73gt. Even modding the inf file didn't help.

jmke 27th June 2007 11:24

try 6.14.11.6501

Pardons 27th June 2007 12:19

Quote:

Originally Posted by jmke (Post 147631)
try 6.14.11.6501

165 drivers :)

Pardons 27th June 2007 14:24

1 Attachment(s)
VGPU 1.9V
Vmem 2.35V
LOL

Gamer 27th June 2007 14:29

wow, nice score.
I'm on 210 fps now, same clocks :(


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:45.

Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO