Madshrimps Forum Madness

Madshrimps Forum Madness (https://www.madshrimps.be/vbulletin/)
-   Hardware Overclocking and Case Modding (https://www.madshrimps.be/vbulletin/f10/)
-   -   Raystorm benchmarks (https://www.madshrimps.be/vbulletin/f10/raystorm-benchmarks-610/)

RichBa5tard 13th August 2002 21:18

Quote:

Originally posted by jmke
at what resolution did you run it?
1024*768 (max res of TFT)
Shadows + reflections

The Senile Doctor 14th August 2002 09:11

JMke, I don't see 1024*576 anywhere :-)


1024*768 gives me a score of 4057 @3.060 mhz....fekkin amd lover test :)

jmke 14th August 2002 09:26

weird... my score in resultbrowser displays ->

RichBa5tard 14th August 2002 09:32

I did the test once more: 3934 Marks.

Test is based on pure mathematical powah => AMD's FPU kicks your shiney Intel butt!


LOL, it's funny actually: Intel procs are good, except for calculations... what's else is it supposed to do? ;p

jmke 14th August 2002 10:22

play games @ double speed of AMD system :p

The Senile Doctor 14th August 2002 11:13

rofl @JMke.

RichBa5tard 14th August 2002 12:15

hmm

/me is going to shup up now. :)

septimus 15th August 2002 21:07

This benchmark is pure CPU power right? No video involvement yes? I'll try it out, I wonder what my Tbird 1.333 can do ;)

septimus 15th August 2002 21:21

Ok, it seems that I get 2605 Raymarks after running 640x480 mode with only shadows and reflections enabled. This is on an Athlon 1.331GHz running at 166MHz FSB. I wonder if my memory bandwidth helped at all?

TeuS 15th August 2002 21:46

1349, 640*480, default details

notice the eastereggs:
-nature suxx and nature still suxx at loading screen
-nature suxx at bus stop, at the rear federation against nature

what's up with the nature test???


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 15:48.

Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO