| Thread Tools |
25th June 2004, 01:08 | #1 |
Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,021
| Intel Celeron D: New, Improved & Exceeds Expectations When we first heard that Intel would be continuing the Celeron tradition with a Prescott based "D" line, we were a little skeptical. When we further heard that the Celeron D would only be getting a quarter of the cache its underperforming Pentium 4 parent has, our eyes widened with doubt. Sure, a bump up to a 533MHz FSB would help, but it couldn't possibly make up for the kind of performance issues that we saw with the Pentium 4 E; could it? Looking back over the past of couple months, we can almost imagine Intel knowing what everyone was thinking and going along quietly with a little smirk on its face. That's right, our first inclinations that Celeron D performance would be worse than Intel's already atrocious budget performance were utterly and completely wrong. In fact, the new Celeron D is a big step up in performance over the Northwood-based Celeron. We've gone from thinking that this would be a quick article on the hastening demise of the lowest value "value" chip on the market to an article about how Intel is taking a step in the right direction, while we are once again reminded that knowing the ins and outs of an architecture is no substitute for performance numbers. Of course, that was the point of requiring scaling graphs and analysis along with our simulators back in Microprocessor Architecture class. Before getting to the numbers, we'll take a brief look back at what's inside the new Prescott based Celeron, and we'll try to understand exactly what makes Celeron D so special. http://www.anandtech.com/cpu/showdoc.html?i=2093&p=1
__________________ |
25th June 2004, 01:33 | #2 |
Member Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 15,738
| Time to find out how it oc's.
__________________ lazyman Opteron 165 (2) @2.85 1.42 vcore AMD Stock HSF + Chill Vent II |
25th June 2004, 01:36 | #3 |
Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,021
| Would be cool to have a report on that are they for sale yet?
__________________ |
25th June 2004, 01:42 | #4 |
Member Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 15,738
| Haven't seen it yet. Not even listed in Intel Specs. http://processorfinder.intel.com/scr...asp?ProcFam=49
__________________ lazyman Opteron 165 (2) @2.85 1.42 vcore AMD Stock HSF + Chill Vent II |
25th June 2004, 01:51 | #5 |
Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,021
|
__________________ |
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Intel Denies Plans to Can Celeron Processor Brand | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 14th July 2010 11:42 |
Intel Celeron Waves Good Bye | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 9th July 2010 17:07 |
Celeron lives on, Intel E3000 coming Q3 2009 | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 9th June 2009 14:00 |
Intel Set to Boost Performance of Celeron D Chips | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 15th May 2006 23:24 |
Intel Introduces 64-bit Celeron D Chips | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 27th June 2005 21:31 |
Intel Pushes Intel Pentium M, Intel Celeron M to Servers. | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 14th June 2005 17:27 |
Intel Corp. Preps 64-bit Celeron Launch | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 4th April 2005 11:51 |
Intel Unofficially Sells Forthcoming Celeron D Chips | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 23rd August 2004 10:11 |
Intel Celeron “Prescott” Processors to Get New Branding | jmke | WebNews | 2 | 18th April 2004 17:34 |
Intel Expands Centrino Processor Options - Intel Corp. Debuts New Pentium M, Celeron | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 8th April 2004 10:17 |
Thread Tools | |
| |