jmke

We cannot change the performance overnight, but we are looking into it. If things can change, they will. Right now, per my own testing, the die shrink does seem to have dropped some of the performance off with incompressible data.

CrystalDiskMark
- sequential read : should be around 220 - getting 181 (20% slower)
- 512K read : should be around 210 - getting 175 (15% slower)
- 4K read : should be around 30 - getting 28 (10% slower)
- 4K-QD32 read : should be around 170 - getting 95 (45% slower)

- sequential write : should be around 145 - getting 58 (60% slower)
- 512K write : should be around 140 - getting 58 (60% slower)
- 4K write : should be around 95 - getting 58 (40% slower)
- 4K-QD32 write : should be around 130 - getting 58 (55% slower)

AS SSD
- sequential read : should be around 210 - getting 168 (20% slower)
- 4K read : should be around 23 - getting 19 (20% slower)
- 4K-64 threads read : should be around 125 - getting 84 (30% slower)

- sequential write : should be around 135 - getting 55 (60% slower)
- 4K write : should be around 80 - getting 52 (35% slower)
- 4K-64 threads write : should be around 120 - getting 54 (55% slower)

AS SSD file copying
- ISO file : should be around 115 - getting 65 (45% slower)
- program : should be around 90 - getting 54 (40% slower)
- game : should be around 105 - getting 59 (45% slower)

http://forum.ncixus.com/forums/index...ver clockid=0

__________________