IntroductionIn this article we’ll take a closer look at the performance of ATI’s latest high end card, compared to NVIDIA’s top card. Both cards offer plenty of headroom when using the latest games. In our first review of the
ATI HD 4870 X2 vs NVIDIA Geforce GTX 280 we found that you do not want to invest in these products if you don’t own a high end CPU
and have a high resolution monitor.
If your game setup is up to the challenge you’ll find this review interesting as we’ll be using a multitude of Anti-Aliasing settings to see how each card handles the extra rendering load. The HD 4870 X2 GPU can access its onboard 2Gb GDDR5 and this should give it an edge once the resolution and AA levels are increased. By how much you’ll find out on the following pages.
The second effect on performance we liked to investigate was the OS. Our previous review was done with Windows XP SP3. While the majority of users out there are still using XP, those into gaming and multi-GPU high end configurations are more likely to use Vista, and to be able to use more than 3Gb system memory, 64-bit Vista.
So we’ll investigate AA performance in XP SP3 (32-bit) and Vista SP1 (64-bit).

Which OS will offer the best gaming performance?
Test Setup & BenchmarksWe build our test setup with the help of
Tones.be (Belgian’s Largest Hardware Shop!) who helped us with the hard drives, CPUs and monitors,
MSI for the motherboards,
OCZ for the memory,
Coolermaster for the cases and power supplies and last but not least,
Scythe for the silent CPU coolers.
We like to thank
Sapphire for providing the HD 4870 X2 for test and
Leadtek for their Winfast GTX 280. Without their support this article would not have been possible.
At the time of writing the system we build would cost you approximately ~€1200 without the VGA card. While it’s not a budget system, it’s also far from high end as we’re using a DDR2 motherboard and a mid-range Wolfdale CPU. Combining it with a €300+ VGA card does place it in the more expensive bracket when it comes down to building a game machine.
One of the costs for a system is the monitor for sure, the system price mentioned above includes this screen, a SAMSUNG Syncmaster 2493HM 24inch, it has a native resolution of 1920x1200 this screen offers quite low 5ms latency. Again this screen is mid-range as more expensive models are available, but the resolution of most 26”~27” screens remains the same at 1920x1200 resolution. You need to invest into a 30” to go higher to 2560x1600 at which point you will be spending a pretty hefty sum.
Software config:
OS: Windows XP SP3 and Windows Vista SP1 64-bit
NVIDIA Drivers: Forceware 177.41
ATI Drivers: Catalyst 8.8 (8.52.2)
These are the games we tested:
Devil May Cry 4
Unreal Tournament 3
The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion
S.T.A.L.K.E.R.
Trackmania Nations
Tomb Raider Legend
Mass Effect
Crysis
All tests were done at 1920x1200, the test setup had 2Gb of ram unless otherwise noted.
...8xAA on ATI should be compared to 8xQAA on nV, not the 8xAA which is 4xMSAA based CSAA mode
...16xAA on ATI effectively turn the card into single chip card which can do 16xMSAA, since both chips render the same frame with different AA patterns
...16xAA on nV is 4xMSAA based CSAA mode and 16xQAA on nV is 8xMSAA based CSAA mode
So 16x and 8x comparisons in your graphs are far from being 'fair' or 'apples-to-apples', the 8xAA should have ATI 8xAA vs nV 8xQAA (8xQAA = 8xMSAA) and 16xAA shouldn't even exist since the GTX280 can't do 16xMSAA which is (practicly) what the HD4870X2 is doing by blending the same frame rendered twice with different AA patterns.