JMke's INTEL Test Setup |
CPU | Intel P4 2ghz "A" @ 3 Ghz |
Mainboard | Asus P4C800 |
Cooling | * Zalman CNPS-7000Cu * Hypercool HC I+ * Hypercool HC II+ |
Memory | 2 * Corsair PC3200 Pro 512Mb |
Video | nVidia Geforce 4 Ti4600 |
The Hypercool heatsinks trail 4-5°C at low and high speed, the difference between the HC I and HC II is negligible.
When we increase the heat the difference simply doubles, the Zalman is still able to cool the CPU at low fan speeds; the Hypercool could not keep the system stable unfortunately.
JMke's AMD Test Setup |
CPU | AMD Athlon XP 2200+ @ 2025Mhz - 1.8v |
Mainboard | Abit KX7 |
Cooling | * Aerocool Extreme * Evercool CUF-715CA * Primecooler HC I+ * Primecooler HC II+ |
Memory | 1 * 256Mb PC3200 Corsair |
Video | nVidia Geforce DDR |
The
Evercool CUF-715A was included in a
heatsink roundup back in December 2003. It performs quite well and comes at a decent price, graphed below compared to the default AMD HSF and the current pricy Socket A cooler champ (for more info on those tests click the graph):
The
Aerocool Extreme is small copper heatsink which features a thin base and a quite noisy 80mm fan, we will have a closer look at this HSF near the end of the week.
So how do the Hypercoolers stack up?
At its lowest fan setting we see the HC II+ equal the Evercool in performance, which features a louder 70mm fan. On the other hand we have the HC I+ which makes the CPU temperature rise to dangerous levels with a low spinning fan , luckily however both heatsink excel when we increase the airflow.
Why is the Zalman CNPS-7000Cu missing you might ask? Unfortunately the –Cu version doesn’t come with AMD AXP mounting gear.
Onto pricing and the conclusion ->