Madshrimps Forum Madness

Madshrimps Forum Madness (https://www.madshrimps.be/vbulletin/)
-   Articles & Howto's (https://www.madshrimps.be/vbulletin/f6/)
-   -   My next upgrade. (https://www.madshrimps.be/vbulletin/f6/my-next-upgrade-4652/)

RichBa5tard 21st April 2004 09:15

This would be a very interesting editoral indeed.

I don't fully agree with the following though:
Quote:

Originally posted by jmke
sure there were a lot steps , but compare with the older series

P1 - 70 90 120 133 166 200 233
P2 - 233 250 300 333 366 433(?) 450
P3 - 500 550 600 650 700 750 800 866 900 1000

(there are more but don't remember them all)

now take the P4 - 1.5 1.6 1.8 2.0 2.2 2.26 2.4 2.53 2.6 2.66 2.8 3.0 3.06 3.2 3.4

Your P3 series are far from complete, let's compare them all:

P3 Katmai 100 fsb (450 - 550)
P3 Katmai 133fsb (533)
P3 Coppermine slot, 100fsb (600 - 1000)
P3 Coppermine slot, 133fsb (600 - 1133)
P3 Coppermine socket, 100 fsb (600 - 1000)
P3 Coppermine socket, 133 fsb (600 - 1133)
P3 Tualatin socket, 133 fsb (1000 - 1400)

All together, these are 36 (!) different desktop P3 processors. That's a whole lot more than 15 P4 models, don't you think? :)


I fully agree about the Processor hype, but that's mainly because we are pc-enthousiasts and know how to assemble our own pc. It's pretty logical in my humble opinion a average consumer will asume that when he buys a PC with a good processor, he expects it to have an equally good videocard, ram, harddrive, etc. The sad part is most OEM's abuse this fact (look at HP / Packard bell pc's: good cpu, but everything else is as cheap as possible). I admire Dell for this, they might not be cheap, but at least they don't cheat on consumers. A pitty they don't sell cheap Athlon XP rigs for people who don't want to pay for an expensive P3C rig, but don't want a Celeron either.

jmke 21st April 2004 10:00

Quote:

Originally posted by RichBa5tard

Your P3 series are far from complete, let's compare them all:

"(there are more but don't remember them all)"
just wait 6 months, the P4 series will surpass your number of 36 :)


if Intel doesn't solve the preshott problem then Dell might consider AMD, they have not changed their minds yet, but the ways things are going... :)

DUR0N 21st April 2004 17:39

jeuj, sata speeds double, HDD's still can't keep up.
the bottleneck is imo the HD, not the interface :)

jmke 21st April 2004 17:44

put 5 HD's on one controller,
then try to convince me "it's not the interface"

IKilledMyAGOIA 25th April 2004 03:44

well, there is 2.4a 2.4b 2.4c and 2.4e

bleh

im sticking with the much saner athlonxps

btw, i just won a contest so my computer gets a total overhaul - $200 from monarchcomputers so im gonna get an nf7-s r2 and mobile 2500, then sell my soltek, 1700, and xms to buy ram

IKilledMyAGOIA 25th April 2004 03:52

Quote:

Originally posted by RichBa5tard

I fully agree about the Processor hype, but that's mainly because we are pc-enthousiasts and know how to assemble our own pc. It's pretty logical in my humble opinion a average consumer will asume that when he buys a PC with a good processor, he expects it to have an equally good videocard, ram, harddrive, etc. The sad part is most OEM's abuse this fact (look at HP / Packard bell pc's: good cpu, but everything else is as cheap as possible). I admire Dell for this, they might not be cheap, but at least they don't cheat on consumers. A pitty they don't sell cheap Athlon XP rigs for people who don't want to pay for an expensive P3C rig, but don't want a Celeron either.

here in the states - go to a best buy/ circuit city and find a p4 3.2C using a freakin 9200 or 5200 vid card, and thats the norm

its sad - and yet people still compare the prices on those pieces of crap to quotes you give them on decent computers

Sidney 25th April 2004 12:32

Just because enthusiasts assemble their PC, does not mean it is money well spent. It's worst; because they all want a bigger **** than others; >$500 for processor, >$400 graphic cards.

Who do you think buying the 1st 1000 units? Stupid enthusiasts, in many ways.

DUR0N 25th April 2004 17:47

Quote:

Originally posted by jmke
put 5 HD's on one controller,
then try to convince me "it's not the interface"

what do you mean?

if you put 5 hd's on one controller, the PCI bus is the bottleneck imo.

piotke 25th April 2004 18:09

Quote:

Originally posted by lazyman
Just because enthusiasts assemble their PC, does not mean it is money well spent. It's worst; because they all want a bigger **** than others; >$500 for processor, >$400 graphic cards.
Wel, I also want to have the fastest possible stuff, but I never buy top line, for example now a 9800Xt, while the pro costs half of it...

But I know what I buy, ad mostely it has a decent overclocking capability...

Sidney 26th April 2004 03:36

Quote:

I also want to have the fastest possible stuff, but I never buy top line, for example now a 9800Xt, while the pro costs half .
So, you are about 6 months behind kind of guys with Vcard; and MAY be two months behind in CPU/Board.

Corporate America is 3.5 YEARS behind on average; because write-off of investment is about 3 years.

But, here is an interesting article, although written a few years back it is holding its value even today.

http://www.dansdata.com/sbs12.htm

Look at this from another angle:

1) The upgrade will increase your productivity with which you will have more idle time = no upgrade necessary.
2) The upgrade will increase your productivity otherwise you could not perform your duty = upgrade is necessary.
3) The upgrade allows you to get to a higher level of competency = uppgrade is necessary.
4) Without constant upgrade you feel unhappy hence affecting your daily productivity = you need to find a life, upgrade is unnecessary

:mad: :super:


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 18:26.

Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO