It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register please click here...

 
Go Back [M] > Madshrimps > Site & Forum Feedback - Folding@Home
new reply email notification new reply email notification
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


new reply email notification
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 9th June 2006, 12:03   #1
Madshrimp
 
jmke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,021
jmke has disabled reputation
Default new reply email notification 1

For those who subscribe to certain threads, I will be interesting to know that I've done a small modification to include the message that is posted in the email (much like you get with vB3)

that way you immediately see the message that is posted


here's an example I tried:




Hello jmke,

test has just replied to a thread you have subscribed to entitled - Piotr is blogging - in the Off-Topic Hangout forum of Forum Madness @ Madshrimps.

~~~~~~~~~~~~ message posted ~~~~~~~~~~~~
In Q1 of 2006, AMD-based systems accounted for over $1 billion, or one sixth of the x86 server space. The Opteron grew from a 6% market share to 15% market share in the astonishingly short period of only one year. In four socket servers, the Opteron grabbed 48% of the US market, up from 23% last year. What's more, this is not a "US only" phenomenon: the Opteron has a firm grip on 36% of the worldwide four socket market. Bear in mind that less than 4 years ago, AMD was nothing more than a blip on the server CPU radar.

Sun, which was getting strangled by the high volume Intel Xeon and the mighty Itanium, has also made a big comeback. An attractive UltraSparc IV+ with a fast, integrated L2 cache and massive L3 cache keeps the traditional Sparc buyers loyal, while the well-designed Galaxy Opteron based servers are pretty popular and the UltraSparc T1 "throughput CPU" attacks the midrange x86 market.

It's high time for Intel to find a proper response, as the competition is taking the wind out of Intel's server CPU sails. What's the answer? A Xeon based on the Core architecture: Woodcrest. We compared the Core and K8 architectures just a month ago. Memory disambiguation, large OOO buffers and a large but low latency shared L2 cache should make the Core architecture more efficient in server related tasks than any other x86 CPU.

This article compares a Woodcrest based Intel server with its closest rivals: AMD Opteron based servers such as the HP DL385 and MSI K2-102A2M and the UltraSparc T1 based Sun T2000 server.
~~~~~~~~~~~~ end of message ~~~~~~~~~~~~

To view the thread visit: http://www.madshrimps.be/forums/show...6&goto=newpost
__________________
jmke is offline  
Old 9th June 2006, 14:28   #2
[M] Reviewer
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 5,003
piotke Freshly Registered
Default

Very good !

Like it.
__________________
.
piotke is offline  
Old 9th June 2006, 14:33   #3
Madshrimp
 
jmke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,021
jmke has disabled reputation
Default

it's wasn't that hard either I've also (again?) removed all [Acronym=yellow]redirect pages[/Acronym], so no intermediate "post edited, thread post, reply posted" messages and after a new reply you are now correctly forwarded to your post

[box=yellow]a yellow box with text[/box]


[box=blue]a blue box with text[/box]
__________________
jmke is offline  
Old 9th June 2006, 15:57   #4
test
 
Posts: n/a
Default title

this is only a test -- yes
 
Old 9th June 2006, 16:05   #5
Madshrimp
 
jmke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,021
jmke has disabled reputation
Default

Quick-Edit added, no need to reload the thread, you just click the small radio button and you are good to go!


working nicely
__________________
jmke is offline  
Old 10th June 2006, 14:56   #6
[M] Reviewer
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 5,003
piotke Freshly Registered
Default

Really
__________________
.
piotke is offline  
Old 10th June 2006, 16:23   #7
Madshrimp
 
jmke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,021
jmke has disabled reputation
Default

now use a resolution which is not from the stone ages
__________________
jmke is offline  
Old 10th June 2006, 16:26   #8
Madshrimp
 
jmke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,021
jmke has disabled reputation
Default

really
__________________
jmke is offline  
Old 10th June 2006, 17:00   #9
Member
 
jort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: mechelen(belgium)
Posts: 2,037
jort Freshly Registered
Default

laptop only supports 1024

so forum looks wierd too previous was better.
__________________
watercooling, chilled water,direct phase change, cascade, custom modding
jort is offline  
Old 10th June 2006, 17:03   #10
Madshrimp
 
jmke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,021
jmke has disabled reputation
Default

most used feature is webnew forum & "new posts" link; main forum page is not as used as you might think

it's not perfect, not claiming it to be either; it's a WIP as usual, but working nonetheless
__________________
jmke is offline  
Closed Thread


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
2003 Bill Gates email reveals frustrations with Windows XP jmke WebNews 0 26th June 2008 00:15
92.3 percent of all email sent in Q1 2008 was spam jmke WebNews 0 17th April 2008 09:47
AOL's free AIM.COM email is surprisingly good Sidney WebNews 1 25th June 2005 23:22
what is a MONITORED email adress Nocutius Site & Forum Feedback - Folding@Home 2 24th March 2005 17:59
Hacker breaches T-Mobile systems, reads US Secret Service email jmke WebNews 0 12th January 2005 11:01
foutje in reply systeem biCker Site & Forum Feedback - Folding@Home 3 19th October 2002 01:34
email notification fredperry Site & Forum Feedback - Folding@Home 2 16th June 2002 18:49

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 14:39.


Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO