It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register please click here...

 
Go Back [M] > Madshrimps > WebNews
Why You Should AVOID Core 2 Duo Engineering Samples Why You Should AVOID Core 2 Duo Engineering Samples
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Why You Should AVOID Core 2 Duo Engineering Samples
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12th May 2007, 00:26   #1
Madshrimp
 
jmke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,021
jmke has disabled reputation
Default Why You Should AVOID Core 2 Duo Engineering Samples

All in all, it is generally not a good idea to buy an Intel Core 2 Duo engineering sample. Obviously, it is cheaper than an OEM processor, and certainly much cheaper than a retail-packed processor. Even with the recent price cuts by Intel, these ES units are still being sold cheaply enough to make them really enticing.

http://www.techarp.com/showarticle.a...tno=407&pgno=1
__________________
jmke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th May 2007, 11:21   #2
Rutar
 
Posts: n/a
Default

lol, are there even ES for normal people and not people who are hot on the unlocked multi?
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th May 2007, 12:00   #3
[M] Reviewer
 
thorgal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,887
thorgal Freshly Registered
Default

What a load of BS

I've owned so many ES samples by now and haven't had a single problem with them. This article is pure Intel companyspeak
__________________



thorgal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th May 2007, 16:23   #4
[M] Reviewer
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Waregem
Posts: 6,466
Massman Freshly Registered
Default

You're right Thorgal ... I guess Intel just doesn't like so many ES samples on the market
Massman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th May 2007, 22:52   #5
Kougar
 
Posts: n/a
Default

You cannot deny his points regarding poorer overclocking and usually higher heat generation due to higher voltages. Not to mention the lack of any warranty I presume.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th May 2007, 23:13   #6
Madshrimp
 
jmke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,021
jmke has disabled reputation
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by thorgal View Post
This article is pure Intel companyspeak
I agree
__________________
jmke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th May 2007, 08:08   #7
[M] Reviewer
 
thorgal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,887
thorgal Freshly Registered
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kougar View Post
You cannot deny his points regarding poorer overclocking and usually higher heat generation due to higher voltages. Not to mention the lack of any warranty I presume.
Honestly, I do deny that.

it's a bit of hit and miss of course, the same as with retail/OEM cpu's. For example, I'm still holding on to my step 5 Conroe ES which is far superior to most of the step 6 retail CPU's (exceptions notwithstanding). The only valid point concerns some of the B0 offerings : they are indeed early samples, and can run rather hot (Kentsfield B0 was a hot MF indeed )
__________________



thorgal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th May 2007, 08:35   #8
Kougar
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I'll grant there are plenty of exceptions yes, but I have only seen the majority of ES chips to overclock poorly, or require higher voltages to reach the same levels. This is also true for those people I somewhat know that acquired one themselves.

I'll grant I never bothered to distinguish between which kind of ES chip, so I do hold that view of them in general. I consider my E6300 to have be of somewhat middle to poor stock but it runs at 3.6ghz stable, almost but not quite 3.73ghz stable at 1.5v. Considering most X6800's and lower chips tend to use a 1.25vcore and the lower bins tend to ship with 1.325vcore despite the much lower speeds, which mine falls under, I know my own chip should fall only within the middle-range as far as overclocking goes.

Last edited by Kougar : 13th May 2007 at 08:38.
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th May 2007, 13:47   #9
Rutar
 
Posts: n/a
Default

if thats 3.6 on air, then it isn't a bad chip at all
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th May 2007, 14:05   #10
[M] Reviewer
 
thorgal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,887
thorgal Freshly Registered
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rutar View Post
if thats 3.6 on air, then it isn't a bad chip at all
Indeed, a 6300 @ 3.6 stable is very good indeed
__________________



thorgal is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Intel Introduces Second Core 2 Duo Stepping jmke WebNews 0 16th July 2007 08:31
Intel Core 2 Duo E4300 to be released on 21st Jan 07 jmke WebNews 3 16th November 2006 06:54
AOpen Mini PC Compatible with Core 2 Duo Merom jmke WebNews 0 30th August 2006 22:52
Intel Mobile Core 2 Duo "Merom" Bench-Test and Showcase jmke WebNews 0 28th August 2006 21:51
Core 2 Duo Arrives for Notebooks jmke WebNews 0 28th August 2006 11:18
Mobile CPU Wars: Core 2 Duo vs. Core Duo jmke WebNews 2 3rd August 2006 15:44
NVIDIA Brings the Power of SLI Technology to Intel Core 2 Duo Platforms jmke WebNews 0 6th June 2006 14:02

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 00:57.


Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO