Madshrimps Forum Madness

Madshrimps Forum Madness (https://www.madshrimps.be/vbulletin/)
-   WebNews (https://www.madshrimps.be/vbulletin/f22/)
-   -   Western Digital, Seagate and Samsung 640Gb HDDs Compared (https://www.madshrimps.be/vbulletin/f22/western-digital-seagate-samsung-640gb-hdds-compared-61977/)

jmke 7th March 2009 23:16

Western Digital, Seagate and Samsung 640Gb HDDs Compared
 
Dual-platter HDDs have always had an ambiguous standing. They are not remembered as “the world’s first to achieve the capacity of so many gigabytes” but still enjoy well-deserved popularity. It is dual-platter drives that used to have the lowest data storage cost per gigabyte. They have only been outdone recently after the considerable price cut on 1-terabyte models. You can also expect very good performance from them: each of the five HDDs included into this review is based on full-size 320GB platters whereas there can be drives with lower recoding density among 500GB and 750GB models. Well, it is going to be interesting to compare them!

* Samsung SpinPoint F1 DT, 640GB: HD642JJ
* Seagate Barracuda 7200.11, 640GB: ST3640323AS
* Western Digital Caviar Green, 640GB: WD6400AACS
* Western Digital Caviar Blue, 640GB: WD6400AAKS
* Western Digital Caviar Black, 640GB: WD6401AALS

http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/sto...d-roundup.html

jmke 7th March 2009 23:29

compare the PCMark Vantage scores http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/sto...oundup_14.html with those from the Z-Drive http://www.madshrimps.be/?action=get...&articID=9 11 :-)


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 14:48.

Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO