Interview with Seagate about SSDs

jmke · 14th May 2009, 21:35

Rich followed up by saying that Seagate wants to focus on the enterprise market for now and give them a product that will fit in with the current levels of performance and endurance expected in that space. Seagate has taken input from consumers to create a product to meet that demand. To start out they are going to begin with SLC-based products [due to customer input] but feel that the SSD must move to MLC [Multi-Level Cell] in order to be a viable volume product. The issue is that in its current form, MLC is not viable as an enterprise standard - only when this format becomes perfected you can expect Seagate to move to MLC.

But the decision to use SLC or MLC is not the only one Seagate is facing, they are also working to determine the appropriate connection to use; SAS or SATA-II. Each one has pros and cons to them. As it stands right now both are limited to a 3Gb/s transfer rate which in many cases can be quickly saturated by an SSDs or array of SSDs. This limitation that they share should be lifted soon as they both move to 6Gb/s in the near future - as you might already know, AMD is going to be the first company with SATA 3.0 interface, coming in the form of SB850 Southbridge chip. SAS [Serial Attached SCSI - Small Computer System Interface] has a couple of major advantages over SATA though. The two biggest are dual port and error correction. SAS has a much deeper level of error correction and can work all the way down to the media and communicate back to the host. SATA has some basic “best-effort” error correction but is not enough for business critical or mission critical applications. In the end I think that SAS will be the ultimate choice for SSDs in the enterprise segment. SAS offers better performance and robustness than what SATA can provide.

http://www.brightsideofnews.com/news...-own-ssds.aspx

14th May 2009, 22:14

http://www.businessweek.com/chapter/christensen.htm

15th May 2009, 06:16

Was a rather bold move to wait and let the initial wave of SSD makers make the mistakes. Looks like Seagate has positioned itself to learn from them, especially as they hold the IP and technology to design their own SSD controllers. Looks more like their real competition will be against Intel.

14th May 2009, 21:35	#1
jmke Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium Posts: 79,021	Interview with Seagate about SSDs Rich followed up by saying that Seagate wants to focus on the enterprise market for now and give them a product that will fit in with the current levels of performance and endurance expected in that space. Seagate has taken input from consumers to create a product to meet that demand. To start out they are going to begin with SLC-based products [due to customer input] but feel that the SSD must move to MLC [Multi-Level Cell] in order to be a viable volume product. The issue is that in its current form, MLC is not viable as an enterprise standard - only when this format becomes perfected you can expect Seagate to move to MLC. But the decision to use SLC or MLC is not the only one Seagate is facing, they are also working to determine the appropriate connection to use; SAS or SATA-II. Each one has pros and cons to them. As it stands right now both are limited to a 3Gb/s transfer rate which in many cases can be quickly saturated by an SSDs or array of SSDs. This limitation that they share should be lifted soon as they both move to 6Gb/s in the near future - as you might already know, AMD is going to be the first company with SATA 3.0 interface, coming in the form of SB850 Southbridge chip. SAS [Serial Attached SCSI - Small Computer System Interface] has a couple of major advantages over SATA though. The two biggest are dual port and error correction. SAS has a much deeper level of error correction and can work all the way down to the media and communicate back to the host. SATA has some basic “best-effort” error correction but is not enough for business critical or mission critical applications. In the end I think that SAS will be the ultimate choice for SSDs in the enterprise segment. SAS offers better performance and robustness than what SATA can provide. http://www.brightsideofnews.com/news...-own-ssds.aspx __________________

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
DUH! News of the Day: Corsair SSD vs. Seagate HDD: Do SSDs Prevail?	jmke	WebNews	0	24th February 2010 15:25
Seagate and LSI team up to make PCI-Express SSDs	jmke	WebNews	0	27th January 2010 10:07
Seagate Interview: SSD and Enterprise Storage	jmke	WebNews	0	21st September 2009 16:04
Super Talent Launches MLC SATA-II SSDs for Notebooks	jmke	WebNews	1	6th May 2008 09:28
Seagate Unveils Cheetah® NS - Network Storage Hard Drive	jmke	WebNews	0	21st June 2007 17:03
Seagate Ships Half-Terabyte Nearline-Ready SATA Drives to the Channel	jmke	WebNews	0	12th January 2006 00:23
Maxtor “More Capable” of Making Perpendicular Media – Seagate Chief Executive Says	jmke	WebNews	0	23rd December 2005 01:45
Seagate Technology Reports Fiscal First Quarter 2005 Results	jmke	WebNews	1	21st October 2004 07:39
Seagate Savvio Hard Drives to Be Incorporated in IBM eServer(TM)	Sidney	WebNews	0	5th August 2004 07:37
Seagate Rolls Out 400 GB SATA Drives	jmke	WebNews	0	14th June 2004 23:31

14th May 2009, 22:14	#2
Rutar Posts: n/a	http://www.businessweek.com/chapter/christensen.htm

15th May 2009, 06:16	#3
Kougar Posts: n/a	Was a rather bold move to wait and let the initial wave of SSD makers make the mistakes. Looks like Seagate has positioned itself to learn from them, especially as they hold the IP and technology to design their own SSD controllers. Looks more like their real competition will be against Intel.