Intel's CSI to outperform AMD's Hypertransport

jmke · 12th December 2005, 23:43

Intel has an answer for AMD's Hypertransport and thinks its technology stacks up pretty well. In fact, Intel is telling customers that it has AMD beat, starting in 2008.

Intel's CSI high-speed serial interconnect was first meant to appear in a Xeon chip code-named Whitefield. That processor, however, met an untimely death as Intel India mucked up the CSI implementation and forced Intel to rework its plans. As of last check, Intel will now introduce CSI in the Tukwila version of Itanium due out in 2008.

Our sources indicate that an inexperienced Indian staff and not the technology itself was to blame for the Whitefield CSI miss. Intel has been telling customers that CSI will deliver all of the benefits of Hypertransport. And it will be found on chips with integrated memory controllers, putting Intel back on par with AMD.

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/12/12/intel_csi_low/

Sidney · 13th December 2005, 01:22

AMD R/D staffs sleep for 1,000 days, Intel will be ahead of Intel?? Is this the assumption?

13th December 2005, 11:19

2008 o_O

13th December 2005, 12:14

enough time for AMD to tweak and tune their HT-bus

.

13th December 2005, 14:03

so, the 2008 is not a typo?

13th December 2005, 15:27

Quote:

Originally posted by Rutar
so, the 2008 is not a typo?

Nope, unless Ashlee managed to make the same type 4 times

.

Does anybody know how long it will take before it'll be used in normal non-Itanium desktop, or how long will we have to work whith the slow FSB while AMD is racing down the track w/ it's HT bus

.

12th December 2005, 23:43	#1
jmke Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium Posts: 79,021	Intel's CSI to outperform AMD's Hypertransport Intel has an answer for AMD's Hypertransport and thinks its technology stacks up pretty well. In fact, Intel is telling customers that it has AMD beat, starting in 2008. Intel's CSI high-speed serial interconnect was first meant to appear in a Xeon chip code-named Whitefield. That processor, however, met an untimely death as Intel India mucked up the CSI implementation and forced Intel to rework its plans. As of last check, Intel will now introduce CSI in the Tukwila version of Itanium due out in 2008. Our sources indicate that an inexperienced Indian staff and not the technology itself was to blame for the Whitefield CSI miss. Intel has been telling customers that CSI will deliver all of the benefits of Hypertransport. And it will be found on chips with integrated memory controllers, putting Intel back on par with AMD. http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/12/12/intel_csi_low/ __________________

13th December 2005, 01:22	#2
Sidney Member Join Date: Mar 2004 Posts: 15,738	AMD R/D staffs sleep for 1,000 days, Intel will be ahead of Intel?? Is this the assumption? __________________ lazyman Opteron 165 (2) @2.85 1.42 vcore AMD Stock HSF + Chill Vent II

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
AMD's 12-core "Magny-Cours" Opteron 6174 vs. Intel's 6-core Xeon	jmke	WebNews	0	29th March 2010 07:10
Intel's supply shortage is AMD's gain	jmke	WebNews	0	14th July 2009 10:23
AMD HyperTransport 3.1 Announced to help fend off Intel's Quick Path	jmke	WebNews	0	18th August 2008 22:29
A brief look at Intel's new Common Systems Interconnect (CSI)	jmke	WebNews	1	4th September 2007 17:58
Intel's answer to AMD Hypertransport will even up the odds	jmke	WebNews	0	28th August 2007 15:31
AMD's Live® to counter Intel's Viiv®	Sidney	WebNews	0	15th February 2006 03:25
Intel's Pentium M 760 versus AMD's Turion 64 ML-44	jmke	WebNews	1	13th February 2006 19:07
In Chips, AMD's Shipments Zip; Intel's Slip	jmke	WebNews	0	10th May 2005 22:48
AMD's Athlon64 X2 trumps Intel's Pentium D	Sidney	WebNews	0	10th May 2005 06:32
Dual Core Wars: Intel's Dempsey set to knuckle AMD's Toledo	jmke	WebNews	0	17th August 2004 22:29

13th December 2005, 12:14	#4
wutske Posts: n/a	enough time for AMD to tweak and tune their HT-bus .

13th December 2005, 14:03	#5
Rutar Posts: n/a	so, the 2008 is not a typo?