| |||||||||
![]() | ![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools |
![]() | #1 |
Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,010
![]() | ![]() Obviously we'll reserve final judgments on Penryn for our official review of the CPU, but these initial results look very promising. We would expect to see clock for clock Penryn vs. Conroe improvements to be in the 5 - 10% range at minimum depending on the application. Factor in higher clock speeds and you can expect our CPU performance charts to shift up by about 20% by the end of this year. http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets...oc.aspx?i=2972
__________________ ![]() |
![]() | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Intel Core i7 Memory Performance | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 26th January 2009 18:14 |
Intel Low-End Processors Performance Comparison | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 11th September 2008 12:23 |
Intel to increase graphics performance by 10x | jmke | WebNews | 1 | 17th October 2007 14:53 |
DDR3 vs. DDR2 - Performance tests on Intel P35 Chipset | jmke | WebNews | 4 | 16th May 2007 11:06 |
Performance and Power Management Technologies in Intel Processors | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 13th December 2006 12:09 |
Intel Kentsfield quad-core performance preview | jmke | WebNews | 1 | 29th September 2006 20:32 |
Intel Core 2 Duo E6700 Performance Tested versus AMD S939/AM2 and Intel P4 | jmke | WebNews | 3 | 22nd June 2006 00:09 |
Intel Set to Boost Performance of Celeron D Chips | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 16th May 2006 00:24 |
Thread Tools | |
| |