Hard drive shipments grow rapidly despite recession

jmke · 26th July 2008, 11:27

With the overall economy in recession and prices for even the highest-end hard drives plummeting, it would seem likely that the hard drive industry would be in dire financial straits. A new report from industry analysis firm iSuppli, however, indicates that few things are further from the truth. Hard drive firms are shipping a record number of drives with an average size larger than ever before and are making money hand over fist. The new data has some interesting implications for the industry and for storage at large.

In the first quarter of 2008, iSuppli says hard drive firms sold 137 million individual drives in a variety of form factors for use in laptop and desktop computers, consumer electronics, external hard drives, and enterprise applications. This represents a 21% increase year-on-year in total drives shipped, not a record growth rate for the industry, but above average in a sector which has been growing at double-digit rates for decades, save a brief stutter in 2001.

http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post...recession.html

27th July 2008, 00:05

13 cents per GB for 750GB Seagate OR Samsung drives, they certainly as heck are going to be shipping lots of them! Will soon be half the price then they were last year at this time. Incredibly tempted to buy another 750GB Seagate and RAID 0 them, but have no need for a 1.5TB drive.

jmke · 27th July 2008, 01:18

what would you put on 750Gb RAID 0? What kind of data don't you care about?

I would buy 1.5TB drives to put them in RAID1/5 just to get hardware failure out of the way as possible data loss cause; then create a second RAID1/5 to do a scheduled incremental backup of the first array so you can restore previous versions as well as recover from OS/software data corruption where RAID doesn't help you at all.

with so much storage space available with a single disk, you can set & forget and use multiple HDD disks to provide enough backup copies that even a complete server-burn-down would not mean data loss

27th July 2008, 02:05

Very true.

All my data is backed up however, so I am only interested in a nice performance boost. Because Vista supports Intel chipset RAID out of the box, no driver hassle required, I might RAID 0 two drives when I test out Vista 64bit later on.

26th July 2008, 11:27	#1
jmke Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium Posts: 79,021	Hard drive shipments grow rapidly despite recession With the overall economy in recession and prices for even the highest-end hard drives plummeting, it would seem likely that the hard drive industry would be in dire financial straits. A new report from industry analysis firm iSuppli, however, indicates that few things are further from the truth. Hard drive firms are shipping a record number of drives with an average size larger than ever before and are making money hand over fist. The new data has some interesting implications for the industry and for storage at large. In the first quarter of 2008, iSuppli says hard drive firms sold 137 million individual drives in a variety of form factors for use in laptop and desktop computers, consumer electronics, external hard drives, and enterprise applications. This represents a 21% increase year-on-year in total drives shipped, not a record growth rate for the industry, but above average in a sector which has been growing at double-digit rates for decades, save a brief stutter in 2001. http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post...recession.html __________________

27th July 2008, 01:18	#3
jmke Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium Posts: 79,021	what would you put on 750Gb RAID 0? What kind of data don't you care about? I would buy 1.5TB drives to put them in RAID1/5 just to get hardware failure out of the way as possible data loss cause; then create a second RAID1/5 to do a scheduled incremental backup of the first array so you can restore previous versions as well as recover from OS/software data corruption where RAID doesn't help you at all. with so much storage space available with a single disk, you can set & forget and use multiple HDD disks to provide enough backup copies that even a complete server-burn-down would not mean data loss __________________

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Samsung hard drive problems with Abit AX8 motherboard	Angel Blue01	Hardware/Software Problems, Bugs	1	1st July 2009 09:27
Hitachi working on 4000Gb Hard Drive	jmke	WebNews	0	15th October 2007 13:03
Seagate Unveils Cheetah® NS - Network Storage Hard Drive	jmke	WebNews	0	21st June 2007 17:03
Seagate Initiates Shipments of 1TB Hard Disk Drive	jmke	WebNews	0	8th June 2007 11:34
Western Digital Releases Its Largest Hard Disk Drive: 400GB	jmke	WebNews	0	24th July 2005 20:41
Western Digital Answers Customer Call With Entry Into Fast-growing Mobile Hard Drive	jmke	WebNews	0	6th October 2004 10:10
Seagate Rolls Out 400 GB SATA Drives	jmke	WebNews	0	14th June 2004 23:31
Q2 2004 Desktop Hard Drive Comparison: WD Raptor vs the World	jmke	WebNews	0	7th June 2004 18:43
Unused space on hard drives recovered	jmke	WebNews	13	10th March 2004 14:24

27th July 2008, 00:05	#2
Kougar Posts: n/a	13 cents per GB for 750GB Seagate OR Samsung drives, they certainly as heck are going to be shipping lots of them! Will soon be half the price then they were last year at this time. Incredibly tempted to buy another 750GB Seagate and RAID 0 them, but have no need for a 1.5TB drive.

27th July 2008, 02:05	#4
Kougar Posts: n/a	Very true. All my data is backed up however, so I am only interested in a nice performance boost. Because Vista supports Intel chipset RAID out of the box, no driver hassle required, I might RAID 0 two drives when I test out Vista 64bit later on.