It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register please click here...

 
Go Back [M] > Madshrimps > WebNews
Google Platforms Rant Google Platforms Rant
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Google Platforms Rant
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 13th October 2011, 16:20   #1
Madshrimp
 
jmke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,021
jmke has disabled reputation
Default Google Platforms Rant

Facebook, though: they worry me. I'm no expert, but I'm pretty sure they started off as a Product and they rode that success pretty far. So I'm not sure exactly how they made the transition to a platform. It was a relatively long time ago, since they had to be a platform before (now very old) things like Mafia Wars could come along.

Maybe they just looked at us and asked: "How can we beat Google? What are they missing?"

The problem we face is pretty huge, because it will take a dramatic cultural change in order for us to start catching up. We don't do internal service-oriented platforms, and we just as equally don't do external ones. This means that the "not getting it" is endemic across the company: the PMs don't get it, the engineers don't get it, the product teams don't get it, nobody gets it. Even if individuals do, even if YOU do, it doesn't matter one bit unless we're treating it as an all-hands-on-deck emergency. We can't keep launching products and pretending we'll turn them into magical beautiful extensible platforms later. We've tried that and it's not working.

The Golden Rule of Platforms, "Eat Your Own Dogfood", can be rephrased as "Start with a Platform, and Then Use it for Everything." You can't just bolt it on later. Certainly not easily at any rate -- ask anyone who worked on platformizing MS Office. Or anyone who worked on platformizing Amazon. If you delay it, it'll be ten times as much work as just doing it correctly up front. You can't cheat. You can't have secret back doors for internal apps to get special priority access, not for ANY reason. You need to solve the hard problems up front.

I'm not saying it's too late for us, but the longer we wait, the closer we get to being Too Late.

I honestly don't know how to wrap this up. I've said pretty much everything I came here to say today. This post has been six years in the making. I'm sorry if I wasn't gentle enough, or if I misrepresented some product or team or person, or if we're actually doing LOTS of platform stuff and it just so happens that I and everyone I ever talk to has just never heard about it. I'm sorry.

But we've gotta start doing this right.

https://plus.google.com/112678702228...ts/eVeouesvaVX
__________________
jmke is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Google Engineer Calls Google+ a Pathetic Afterthought Stefan Mileschin WebNews 0 13th October 2011 06:36
Google Kills Google.cn, Redirects Traffic to Hong Kong jmke WebNews 0 23rd March 2010 10:23
China Hacks Google Servers, Google decides to remove content filter on Google.cn jmke WebNews 0 13th January 2010 15:39
Google Phone: $199 unlocked - $100 rebate if you have Google Account jmke WebNews 0 16th December 2009 13:24
Google hacks the Wii Balance Board to surf Google Earth jmke WebNews 0 9th January 2009 20:03
Google: No Google browser needed, users have good choices already jmke WebNews 4 1st June 2006 19:32
AMD samples AM2 platforms jmke WebNews 0 18th April 2006 12:00
See No Google, Hear No Google, Speak No Google Sidney WebNews 1 15th September 2004 06:45

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 19:50.


Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO