 |  |  |  |  |
First real performance results from Nehalem @ OCXtreme
| |||||||||
|
First real performance results from Nehalem @ OCXtreme
| | |||||||
 |
 |
| | Thread Tools |
4th October 2008, 12:51
| #1 |
| [M] Reviewer Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Waregem
Posts: 6,466
 |  First real performance results from Nehalem @ OCXtreme Coolaler just posted his first results of the new Nehalem technology. Coolaler is known for his extreme overclocking results and will probably be pushing this Core I7 Extreme 965 under LN2 any time soon. http://www.ocxtreme.org/forumenus/showthread.php?t=3978
__________________  |
|  |
|
4th October 2008, 20:39
| #2 |
|
Posts: n/a
| Okay, that's funny. 3.2GHz DDR3-1600 7-7-7-21 SuperPI 1M 12.703 seconds 27.4ns Latency 3.2GHz DDR3-1333 9-9-9-24 SuperPI 1M 12.750 seconds 36.8ns Latency |
| |
|
4th October 2008, 20:46
| #3 |
| [M] Reviewer Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Waregem
Posts: 6,466
| 1M has nothing to do with memory speed; compare 32M for real differences 
__________________ |
|
| |
|
4th October 2008, 22:17
| #4 |
|
Posts: n/a
| He only does 32M for the stock settings. Nothing to compare against within his testing. More interested in latency/timing effects on performance Last edited by Kougar : 4th October 2008 at 22:21. |
| |
|
5th October 2008, 09:34
| #5 |
| Madshrimp  Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,013
 | these OC tests have usually not a whole lot of useful info when you actually want to know how fast a the new platform is as the one doing the tests is never a regular Joe 
__________________  |
|
| |
|
5th October 2008, 12:40
| #6 |
| [M] Reviewer Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Waregem
Posts: 6,466
| These are only results of preliminary testing, don't expect people to push and produce interesting comparo's minutes after they recieved the hardware. He'll be updating the thread with more results, I'm sure. By the way, if you want comparo's, search HWbot's database for scores with similarly clocked configurations (www.hwbot.org).
__________________ |
|
| |
|
6th October 2008, 01:32
| #7 |
|
Posts: n/a
| I don't "expect" interesting comparisons to all my questions. Just is my point of view testing within the platform to see what tweaks/setups is more interesting/useful. Such as low latency RAM, or if its better to just buy the cheapest kit. My post earlier about the SuperPI results: This bascially seems to confirm what Intel was telling people... tight timings/bandwidth doesn't seem to matter anymore. I'll wait for Anandtech to do a full review though to be sure on that. It is funny CoreTemp is reporting temps for 8 cores.  Last edited by Kougar : 6th October 2008 at 01:35. |
| |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| |
