| |||||||||
![]() | ![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools |
![]() | #1 |
Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,013
![]() | ![]() I think DirectX 9 was the last graphics API that really mattered. DirectX 9 was a revolution: completely programmable shaders of unlimited length with full floating-point precision support. Compared with the fixed-function, 8-bit pipeline it replaced, it was revolutionary. Everything since has been incremental, and kind of backward-looking. So, DirectX 10 takes DirectX 9 and adds some weird fixed-function components on top of it, which fit in a very particular place in the pipeline, and are hard to use. I'm not saying that it's entirely unwarranted, but I think that DirectX 9 was the last game-changing step in the graphics APIs, and the next non-incremental step will be the move back to programming languages. http://arstechnica.com/articles/paed...-interview.ars
__________________ ![]() |
![]() | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Tim Sweeney and Andrew Richards debate the future of graphics hardware | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 14th June 2010 20:48 |
Tim Sweeney: GPGPU Software Uneconomical to Develop, GPUs Set to Disappear | jmke | WebNews | 1 | 14th August 2009 14:50 |
What's next for DirectX? A DirectX 11 overview | Massman | WebNews | 0 | 1st September 2008 10:36 |
Game Engine Tech Interview: Tim Sweeney | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 27th August 2006 15:27 |
Tim Sweeney Talks PhysX & UT2007 | jmke | WebNews | 6 | 12th May 2006 16:23 |
Epic Games Mark Rein Interview | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 22nd March 2006 11:30 |
John Carmack and Tim Sweeney Q&A | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 1st February 2006 17:43 |
Talking nasty with Tim Sweeney (Unreal Engine Games) | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 14th December 2004 15:57 |
DirectX 9.0C | 187(V)URD@ | General Madness - System Building Advice | 0 | 27th July 2004 12:15 |
BU Interviews: Tim Sweeney on UE3 | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 18th May 2004 14:42 |
Thread Tools | |
| |