 |  |  |  |  |
Cooler Master NanoFusion Tested
| |||||||||
|
Cooler Master NanoFusion Tested
| | |||||||
 |
 |
| | Thread Tools |
2nd January 2006, 11:25
| #1 |
| Madshrimp  Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,021
 | Cooler Master NanoFusion Tested the NanoFusion still manages to compete with Arctic Silver but is beaten by a 1° difference in every case. The Titan Nano Silver and Evercool STC-01 bring up the rear. http://www.overclockersonline.com/in...ticles&num=341
__________________  |
|  |
|
2nd January 2006, 11:45
| #2 |
|
Posts: n/a
|  still using coolermaster premium here, allmost as good as artic silver 5 but easier to apply. |
| |
|
2nd January 2006, 11:50
| #3 |
| Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,021
| uhm... AS5 is much easier to apply than Coolermaster Premium in my humble opinion Premium is very thick compound compared to AS5 
__________________ |
|
| |
|
2nd January 2006, 12:13
| #4 |
|
Posts: n/a
| looked at my tube CM premium and it looks kinde different from the CM premium they use at reviews :s Mine is brown looking and very easy to apply while the one I see in reviews is silver looking and very hard to apply :s But the one I got still performs better then AS3.  |
| |
|
2nd January 2006, 12:32
| #5 |
|
Posts: n/a
| I use nanoterm pcm, extremely easy to apply  |
| |
|
2nd January 2006, 13:33
| #6 |
|
Posts: n/a
| I use MX1 for long term stability. |
| |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| |
