well... this is weird; don't know what to make of this:



by renaming the .exe name they boost the performance of Furmark and ET:QW; although in their 8.8 vs 8.7 comparo there was no difference; so only at low resolutions this might have an impact? a negligible impact at best...

Remember how changing the name would affect memory performance scores for Futuremark Vantage? Could be the same thing, different, more optimized compiler is used instead?

Would be unlikely that ATI Profiles would hinder performance that much when supposed to do the opposite...