Madshrimps Forum Madness

Madshrimps Forum Madness (https://www.madshrimps.be/vbulletin/)
-   WebNews (https://www.madshrimps.be/vbulletin/f22/)
-   -   AMD's Phenom II X4 965 Black Edition Reviews (https://www.madshrimps.be/vbulletin/f22/amd-s-phenom-ii-x4-965-black-edition-reviews-65630/)

jmke 13th August 2009 09:48

AMD's Phenom II X4 965 Black Edition Reviews
 
Quote:

Without a doubt the Phenom II X4 965 Black Edition is faster than anything you can get that fits into an LGA-775 socket at a remotely similar price point. AMD has done its duty well there, the 965 is clearly a better option than the Q9550 or Q9650 for that matter.

As a gaming CPU, it's actually competitive with the i7s. If you exclude the FarCry 2 results, which I hardly believe are representative of most games, the Phenom II X4 965 is easily just as good of a gaming CPU as an i7 in today's titles. Now once you start throwing in background tasks and look at future titles being more threaded then the picture becomes a little more muddy. Overall application performance is very good from the 965's perspective. It's only in a handful of 3D or well threaded apps where we see the i7 really pull away. The 965 BE is competitive, just not faster.
http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets...spx?i=3619&p=1

http://www.pcper.com/article.php?aid=762&type=expert
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/...-965,2389.html
http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu...ii-x4-965.html
http://www.elitebastards.com/cms/ind...43&Item id=27
http://www.neoseeker.com/Articles/Ha...views/pii_965/
http://www.overclockersclub.com/reviews/phenomii_965/
http://www.guru3d.com/article/phenom...r-review-test/


Quote:

My sense is that AMD has taken a bit of a risk here by introducing a CPU with a 140W TDP at this point in time. They may take flak from some quarters for doing so, and given the fact that Intel's competing product has a 95W TDP, it's not hard to see why. Still, our testing showed that the Phenom II X4 965 isn't a total embarrassment in the peak power draw department, and it actually managed to beat out the Core 2 Quad Q9550 in our key power efficiency metrics thanks to strong performance and low system-level power draw at idle. The X4 965 is also a little faster overall than the Q9550, particularly in floating-point heavy applications like video encoding and 3D rendering. Yes, you will want a relatively large cooler to keep the X4 965 quiet under load, but that's also true of any number of high-end CPUs from Intel and AMD at present.
http://techreport.com/articles.x/17402

jmke 13th August 2009 14:17

More reviews:
http://www.pcgameshardware.com/aid,6...iewed/Reviews/
http://hothardware.com/articles/AMD-...on-CPU-Review/
http://www.techwarelabs.com/amd-phenomii-965/
http://www.elitebastards.com/cms/ind...43&Item id=27
http://benchmarkreviews.com/index.ph...35&Item id=63
http://www.techspot.com/review/185-amd-phenom2-x4-965/
http://www.i4u.com/section-viewarticle-575.html
http://www.bjorn3d.com/read.php?cID=1656
http://translate.google.de/translate...hl=de&ie=UTF-8

wutske 13th August 2009 15:49

In Dutch: http://tweakers.net/reviews/1349/amd...e-core-i7.html

jmke 13th August 2009 15:55

or in Engrish ;)
http://translate.google.com/translat...istory_state0=


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 23:52.

Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO