And they still didn't calculate it the way I wanted too. gotta do it myself >< GPU score of a stock crossfire 2900 setup: 12980 http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=2694745 GPU score of a crossfire 2900 setup near INQ clocks: 13080 http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=2664231 so we get CPU score stock: 10787 CPU score overclocked: 16951 A 57% increase. Does boosting the CPU clock increase the GPU scores that much that my results are completely off? |
you compare C2D to C2Quad ? |
Quote:
|
My Croffire test on DFI RD600, C2D @ 3,23GHz -> 14579 3D Marks 2006 (http://www.madshrimps.be/?action=get...&articID= 581) My other 'unofficial' test on P5B Del, CPU @ 3850MHz -> 15644 3D Marks 2006 (http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=620731) No VGA overclocking with both benchmarks. No perfect compare, second run is more tweaked for high score, and boards are different too, but with ~ 600MHz higher clocked CPU I got around 1000 extra 3D Marks. 3D Mark 2006 does scale well when you overclock your CPU, though knowing that Conroe allready has a short pipeline I can hardly believe that there is so much more performance left. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 15:53. |
Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO