Madshrimps Forum Madness

Madshrimps Forum Madness (https://www.madshrimps.be/vbulletin/)
-   WebNews (https://www.madshrimps.be/vbulletin/f22/)
-   -   64-bit is old hat, Microsoft mulling 128-bit versions of Windows (https://www.madshrimps.be/vbulletin/f22/64-bit-old-hat-microsoft-mulling-128-bit-versions-windows-66794/)

jmke 9th October 2009 15:50

64-bit is old hat, Microsoft mulling 128-bit versions of Windows
 
Believe it or not, Windows 7's successor(s) have been in the planning and early development stages for a while now. We haven't posted anything about any of them yet, but we've been watching closely to see if anything really interesting turned up. Exactly two weeks ago, it did. A LinkedIn profile, which has already been taken down, for a Robert Morgan, Senior Research & Development at Microsoft, has shone a sliver of light on the possibility of 128-bit support coming to Windows 8.

http://arstechnica.com/microsoft/new...-windows-9.ars

Rutar 9th October 2009 19:01

Software still won't support it until 64 bit is turned off, MS failed to axe 32bit with Windows 7 so I don't expect them to get it right this time

wutske 10th October 2009 11:21

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rutar (Post 245551)
Software still won't support it until 64 bit is turned off, MS failed to axe 32bit with Windows 7 so I don't expect them to get it right this time

7 was supposed to be 64bit only, but probably because Vista x64 wasn't a great succes (id Vista wasn't a success overall :rolleyes: ) and x64 driver support is still too basic to push the market in x64.

When Windows 8 comes out, 64-bit support should be much better and not bringing out a 32-bit version of Windows 8 wouldn't be as catastrophic for sales as not brining out a 32-bit version of Windows 7.

Kougar 10th October 2009 21:14

What's wrong with 64bit right now? There isn't any reason to go with 32bit due to 64-bit driver support anymore, in my humble opinion.

Rutar 10th October 2009 21:19

That is the point, there was no reason to relase a 32bit Version of 7 and now it stalls 64 bit software development.

wutske 11th October 2009 09:36

There are still a lot of programs that don't work on 64-bit systems, 64-bit drivers aren't always available either (or they can't be installed because they aren't signed) and in office environments 64-bit isn't necessary because you don't need 4Gb of RAM to use Office...

Rutar 11th October 2009 12:14

chicken-egg problem, if you don't force developers to code in 64 bit they won't

wutske 11th October 2009 13:07

Definitely agree on that one, but Microsoft probably didn't have much choice because of bad Vista sales and Seven has to make up for these bad sales (and a 64-bit only versions probably wouldn't do that).

jmke 11th October 2009 13:24

plenty of 32bit only CPUs out there

Rutar 11th October 2009 13:46

Quote:

Originally Posted by jmke (Post 245651)
plenty of 32bit only CPUs out there

Source?

Would those systems even recieve an OS upgrade?


Microsoft had a choice because it is Microsoft.

Apple is cutting off old system support in new OSes and almost noone complains.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:00.

Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO