4 Is More Than 2 ......

Sidney · 5th December 2007, 16:41

Most attention, too much attention, has been focused on quad-core processors. Yet if you asked most people why they wanted/needed a quadcore, their answer would boil down to "Because 4 is more than 2."

http://overclockers.com/tips01261/

5th December 2007, 18:23

4 is more than 2 but it costs a lot less than 2x2

If similar clocked and cached dualcores would cost half as much, it would be worth bothering not to get a Quad.

5th December 2007, 16:41	#1
Sidney Member Join Date: Mar 2004 Posts: 15,738	4 Is More Than 2 ...... Most attention, too much attention, has been focused on quad-core processors. Yet if you asked most people why they wanted/needed a quadcore, their answer would boil down to "Because 4 is more than 2." http://overclockers.com/tips01261/ __________________ lazyman Opteron 165 (2) @2.85 1.42 vcore AMD Stock HSF + Chill Vent II

5th December 2007, 18:23	#2
Rutar Posts: n/a	4 is more than 2 but it costs a lot less than 2x2 If similar clocked and cached dualcores would cost half as much, it would be worth bothering not to get a Quad.