| Thread Tools |
28th March 2011, 10:59 | #21 |
Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,021
| blast from the past, good to hear it works on x64 Win 7
__________________ |
29th October 2011, 12:47 | #22 |
Posts: n/a
| DataRAM speeds on dualCh.DDR3 1333 CL7! Blast from the past II. (I use Win7 Professional x64 ENGLISH)... On my Asus G73-JH, i7 720QM, 4x2GB Kingston HyperX 1333 CL7 dual ch.: Measured by Crystal DiskMark 3.0.1 x64 - with default settings, 5 measures of 1000MB, the results are impressive (on a NTFS with 4KB clusters, R: 2045MB)... ------------Read------Write--------- [MB/s ] Seq. 3522 4132 512K 3335 3778 4K 281.6 239.9 4K-QD32 287.1 234.3 --------------------------------------------- |
4th February 2013, 12:47 | #23 |
Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,021
| Software RAMDisk have improved... a lot! Free solution here http://www.softperfect.com/products/ramdisk/ with very good performance... if not stellar! same PC I tested before with the other software reached 2500-3000mb/s max. Look at this: 1065Mb/s 4k random speed!
__________________ |
26th February 2013, 10:29 | #24 |
Posts: n/a
| I am not so sure that the Dataram ramdisk is as fast as mentioned here. I did concurrently benchmark the QSoft and the Dataram ramdisks. System : dual Xeon with 16 GB RAM — Windows 8 Pro – 64 bit B:\ Qsoft ramdisk – 3072 GB – FAT32 E:\ Dataram – 3072 MB ( because of the 4GB restriction ) – FAT32 The benchmarks were started at quasi the same time ( within the time to move and click the two start buttons ). By this , the benchmarks run concurrently on the disks with the same size and the same filesystem. I presume this the most accurate test one can perform. It shows that the QSoft ramdisk is “just” a bit faster in almost all test cases , although , the differences are minimal. Attachment 3658 |
4th June 2013, 09:12 | #25 |
Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,021
| stop using either one of those, switch to the one linked above http://www.softperfect.com/products/ramdisk/ speeds have doubled, tripled even
__________________ |
28th January 2014, 08:46 | #26 |
Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,021
| new software to test! Machine: Lenovo T530 with Quad Core CPU and 8GB RAM Current champ is: RAMDisk Software: http://www.softperfect.com/products/ramdisk/ Seq= Read: 6392 Mb/s - Write: 5433 Mb/s 512K= R: 6979 - W: 6848 4K= R: 1163 - W: 912 4K QD32= R: 1134 - W: 873.3 ImDisk Software: http://reboot.pro/files/file/284-imdisk-toolkit/ Seq= Read: 1640 Mb/s - Write: 1879 Mb/s 512K= R: 1643 - W: 1923 4K= R: 376.8 - W: 336.1 4K QD32= R: 744.7 - W: 592.9 nice thing about ImDisk is that it only uses the memory that's actually occupied in the ramdisk. But as you can see, performance wise it stands no chance. 4 times slower with large seq files; 3 times slower with small 4k files. Stick with the former if performance is what you're after!
__________________ |
Thread Tools | |
| |