I've been using the Gilisoft Ramdisk. The interface is much simpler and user friendly, compared to the Dataram product. |
Dataram IU is straight forward, no? :) |
Quote:
However, I've been getting too many crashes with it (Win7 64) but it may have to do with the fact that I've put the OS temp files in there too. |
I had enough with the Gilisoft 3.2. Too many crashes. I went back to the very stable Dataram. |
The testing PC's hardware seems to be BRUTAL to me. Isn't there RAM type DDR3 1066 or 1333 ? On my dual-core AMD Athlon XP x2 1.8 Ghz laptop with DDR II 667 the sequential r/w values are about 845 MB / s. Filip |
(I was measuring DataRAM ramdisk, with the CrystalDisk also). |
yes memory speed matters of course, but DDR2-667 should be sufficient for some nice throughput, 845Mb/s is not too shabby; check your CPU usage, that might be the bottleneck |
Thank You, jmke. Now I am trying to get Dataram working on my new core i5 notebook (Acer Aspire 5470-434G50MN) with Windows 7 Home Premium x64 ! So far no luck. After installation it cannot load some *.OCX driver or so. Anyone have some tips and tricks what to install before Dataram to get it work on Win7 x64 ? Thanx in advance :) |
haven't tested with Win7 yet, x64 is even more complicated |
DataRAM now works on Win 7 x64 !!! On my old Core i5 notebook it worked. around 3200 sequencial R/W. (DDR3 1066 dual channel). On my new core i7 notebook Asus G73JH it works also. It gives me around 3500 MB/s of sequencial R/W. :woot: DataRAM ! DataRAM! Hare-Rammmmmmm, Rammmmmmm, RaMmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm :ws: Filip |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:06. |
Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO