 |  |  |  |  |
12 Software RAM Disk Solutions - Up To 2358/1539Mb/s R/W Speeds
| |||||||||
|
12 Software RAM Disk Solutions - Up To 2358/1539Mb/s R/W Speeds
| | |||||||
 |
 |
| | Thread Tools |
28th March 2011, 10:59
| #21 |
| Madshrimp  Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,021
 |  blast from the past, good to hear it works on x64 Win 7 
__________________  |
|  |
|
29th October 2011, 12:47
| #22 |
|
Posts: n/a
|  DataRAM speeds on dualCh.DDR3 1333 CL7! Blast from the past II. (I use Win7 Professional x64 ENGLISH)... On my Asus G73-JH, i7 720QM, 4x2GB Kingston HyperX 1333 CL7 dual ch.: Measured by Crystal DiskMark 3.0.1 x64 - with default settings, 5 measures of 1000MB, the results are impressive (on a NTFS with 4KB clusters, R: 2045MB)... ------------Read------Write--------- [MB/s ] Seq. 3522 4132 512K 3335 3778 4K 281.6 239.9 4K-QD32 287.1 234.3 ---------------------------------------------  |
| |
|
4th February 2013, 12:47
| #23 |
| Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,021
| Software RAMDisk have improved... a lot! Free solution here http://www.softperfect.com/products/ramdisk/ with very good performance... if not stellar! same PC I tested before with the other software reached 2500-3000mb/s max. Look at this:  1065Mb/s 4k random speed! 
__________________ |
|
| |
|
26th February 2013, 10:29
| #24 |
|
Posts: n/a
| I am not so sure that the Dataram ramdisk is as fast as mentioned here. I did concurrently benchmark the QSoft and the Dataram ramdisks. System : dual Xeon with 16 GB RAM — Windows 8 Pro – 64 bit B:\ Qsoft ramdisk – 3072 GB – FAT32 E:\ Dataram – 3072 MB ( because of the 4GB restriction ) – FAT32 The benchmarks were started at quasi the same time ( within the time to move and click the two start buttons ). By this , the benchmarks run concurrently on the disks with the same size and the same filesystem. I presume this the most accurate test one can perform. It shows that the QSoft ramdisk is “just” a bit faster in almost all test cases , although , the differences are minimal. Attachment 3658 |
| |
|
4th June 2013, 09:12
| #25 |
| Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,021
| stop using either one of those, switch to the one linked above http://www.softperfect.com/products/ramdisk/ speeds have doubled, tripled even
__________________ |
|
| |
|
28th January 2014, 08:46
| #26 |
| Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,021
| new software to test! Machine: Lenovo T530 with Quad Core CPU and 8GB RAM Current champ is: RAMDisk Software: http://www.softperfect.com/products/ramdisk/ Seq= Read: 6392 Mb/s - Write: 5433 Mb/s 512K= R: 6979 - W: 6848 4K= R: 1163 - W: 912 4K QD32= R: 1134 - W: 873.3 ImDisk Software: http://reboot.pro/files/file/284-imdisk-toolkit/ Seq= Read: 1640 Mb/s - Write: 1879 Mb/s 512K= R: 1643 - W: 1923 4K= R: 376.8 - W: 336.1 4K QD32= R: 744.7 - W: 592.9 nice thing about ImDisk is that it only uses the memory that's actually occupied in the ramdisk. But as you can see, performance wise it stands no chance. 4 times slower with large seq files; 3 times slower with small 4k files. Stick with the former if performance is what you're after!
__________________ |
|
| |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| |
