| |||||||||
![]() | ![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools |
![]() | #1 |
Member Join Date: May 2002 Location: wherever the doom is
Posts: 3,171
![]() | ![]() would 2100 mhz (183*11.5@ cas 2 2-2-5) be slower or faster then 2100 mhz (200*10.5 @ cas 2.5 -3-3-7)? there's a 17 mhz increase of fsb but seriously slower timings... best way to tell would be superpi or sth?I don't use sandra. would there be realworld difference when you don't game? probably not...
__________________ OC-2-the-death Where the Reverend is doing his Magick, all mortals be silent Doom over the world |
![]() |
![]() | #2 |
[M] Reviewer Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 5,003
![]() | ![]() when you don't game ? no difference
__________________ . |
![]() |
![]() | #3 |
Member Join Date: May 2002 Location: wherever the doom is
Posts: 3,171
![]() | ![]() as it's a non game pc, I'll leave it as it is at 183*12.5 cas 2 2-2-5
__________________ OC-2-the-death Where the Reverend is doing his Magick, all mortals be silent Doom over the world |
![]() |
![]() | #4 |
Member Join Date: May 2002 Location: wherever the doom is
Posts: 3,171
![]() | ![]() and for games? to whom it may concern : p4 3530 mhz at fsb 235 1.1 ram at cas 3 3-3-6 (tightest possible with my pc3700 at any setting) : 3dmark 21834 p4 3530 mhz at fsb 235 5:4 ram at cas 2 2-5-2 (tight as a duck's *** on pc3200) : 3dmark 21745 p4 3530 mhz at fsb 235 3:2 ram at cas 2 2-5-2 (ram is only at 158!! it's got to bottleneck the cpu now...) : 3dmark 21.012 so the difference on my system in identical conditions between 1:1 at cas 3 3-6-3, and 5:4 cas 2 2-5-2 is 0.3%... which is neglectable in any situation...
__________________ OC-2-the-death Where the Reverend is doing his Magick, all mortals be silent Doom over the world |
![]() |
![]() | #5 |
[M] Reviewer Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 5,003
![]() | ![]() for gamers, wait a couple of days. I just borrowed a stik of Bh-5 from richy, got me an FX5900XT, time to test it, with different memory timings.
__________________ . |
![]() |
![]() | #6 |
Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,013
![]() | ![]() for games use Q3A 640x480, it is a very memory-bandwidth driven application and it shows you the slighest difference remarkably well and repeatidely ! ![]()
__________________ ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Intel 'Turbo Memory' tries to speed up Windows | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 14th August 2008 16:42 |
Texas Memory SSD Breaks Speed, Capacity Record | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 23rd July 2008 19:43 |
Memory speed impact on Intel Core 2 Systems | jmke | WebNews | 5 | 3rd October 2007 17:06 |
Palit HD 2600 XT - Speed vs Memory | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 29th August 2007 14:41 |
Athlon 64 X2: New Memory Dividers and Multitasking Performance | jmke | WebNews | 1 | 13th August 2005 17:46 |
AMD Athlon 64 Processors on E Core: Memory Controller Peculiarities in Detail | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 1st August 2005 09:33 |
Bursting the Athlon 64 Memory bandwidth bubble | jmke | Articles & Howto's | 69 | 1st June 2005 14:57 |
Athlon 64 Memory: Rewriting the Rules | jmke | WebNews | 2 | 2nd October 2004 02:47 |
Elpida Boosts Memory Speed, Merges DDR with DDR2 | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 29th June 2004 09:26 |
RADEON 9800 PRO Gets Lower Speed Memory | jmke | WebNews | 2 | 21st May 2004 17:28 |
Thread Tools | |
| |