anybody need a new screen? |
it's not THAT expensive, early TFTs where equally priced for worse quality |
working atm on one of the first TFT's around. cost 1000€, 15", DFP connector. got a special AGP card with DFP here, but I'm using a DFP=>DVI adapter to my GF4 |
it's a bargain, what does that mean? it's dirt cheap in my humble opinion! |
give 'm hell Doc. :) |
Quote:
It's pretty cheap indeed, though I can't pay it :D |
I call that a nice screen |
Yea that looks awesome. Bit on the big and expensive side for me. Been looking into the 17" & 18" models. Wierdly theres a 17" model that has a response time of 16ms but the fastest 18" was only 25ms. Also the 17" & 18" models have a native resolution of 1280x1024 but does that mean thats as high as they can go? I'm looking for a 17" or 18" LCD with resolutions of 1600x1200 with under 20ms response time? But not too sure if the 17" model with 16ms response time will do 1600x1200. If it does i might just have to get me one of those! |
for 1600*1200 you'll need a larger screen, and you'll have to deal with an even lower refreshrate. (respons time will also be lower most likely) I saw a 20.1" screen for iiyama that had a native resolution of 1600*1200. And yes, natative resolution means that it can't go higher. Ad if you go lower your screen gets blurry (unless you divide the resolution exaclty by 2, 3 or 4) |
Ahhh poo. Looks like i won't be buying a new monitor yet. As i haven't seen any 17" or 18" LCD monitors capable of 1600x1200. Will this ever be possible? I know technology is supposed to be getting better for LCD monitors |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:24. |
Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO