Madshrimps Forum Madness

Madshrimps Forum Madness (https://www.madshrimps.be/vbulletin/)
-   Hardware Overclocking and Case Modding (https://www.madshrimps.be/vbulletin/f10/)
-   -   Itˇ¦s San Diego FX57?! Equips with E4 stepping and SSE3 technology (https://www.madshrimps.be/vbulletin/f10/s-san-diego-fx57-equips-e4-stepping-sse3-technology-14313/)

windwithme 29th April 2005 06:26

Itˇ¦s San Diego FX57?! Equips with E4 stepping and SSE3 technology
 
Got it last night... A strange stuff

Itˇ¦s San Diego core with SSE3. The default Vcore is 1.4V.

I just touch the AMDX2 4800+(2.4G 1MBDual Core Version) 2 days ago... It makes me interest in dual coreˇK


200X14=2.8G Test
1.4V 2.8G CPUMARK break score 360 easily...






In the same clock, the high or low frequency doesnˇ¦t impact the CPUMARK too much, but PI is faster 0.5 second



I will test it detail as I get time...:D

Sidney 29th April 2005 06:42

Show us what you can get out from it :)

windwithme 29th April 2005 16:55

Come on!!! Come on!!!
Main course is coming!!!

CPUZ 1.28-6 still cannot distinguish correctly
BTW, EVEREST b0320 which update several times per day detect correctly.





EVEREST shows







Take a photo by DC
It exposes my desktop with some many messy files...


Finally, itˇ¦s touched CPUZ certification
http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=14897

Some abroad test 4200+ San Diego and use CPU-Z 1.27 version is also in a muckˇK
http://div.bizcity.ro/article.php?sid=9396

So I just said donˇ¦t post CPUZ. It doesnˇ¦t mean anything.
Just shows CPU-Z update is not fast enough...

As this CPU is engineering samlpe, I donˇ¦t post the physical CPU photo.
I donˇ¦t want to be invited by AMD to drink coffee

Gamer 29th April 2005 18:12

damn, thought they where on 0.9 micron ?

you want to send it over ? :)

kristos 30th April 2005 00:35

cpu-z verifictation still shows the errors though :)


I am eagerly awaiting your overclocking results :grin:

windwithme 2nd May 2005 03:42

One more software party



As you can see, EVEREST updates from 0316 to 0322 in 3 days
Thatˇ¦s why he can detect correct information.
Socket 939
San Diego
E4
SSE3


Japanese CrystalCPUID can distinguish San Diego core and NV technology as well.

CPU-Z is really awful, even detect it as Socket 940.
As a matter of course 0.13.SH7-B3 and SledgeHammer these kind wrong information.
The test below of 4200+ CPU-Z is even worse.

http://div.bizcity.ro/article.php?sid=9396

However, I still got the CPUZ certified.
Is it possible that I bribe the worldˇ¦s software providers?
Is it possible that San Diego + SSE3 + E4 is not FX57?
Does AMD have another San Diego product line for FX51, FX53, or FX55?
Is that true, as this CPU cannot be reached?
Motherboard and BIOS providers may got this CPU for product modification long time ago.

One of my best friends who works in Inventec SERVER qualification department got 940 dual core CPU long time ago.
He said I was inferior to him that only got E4 stepping not Dual Core one.

laugh:^D

windwithme 2nd May 2005 06:04

I waste lots of time for boring CPU-Z.
Iˇ¦ve been using computer for 6 years and not first time using CPU-Z.
Usually, when new CPU coming, CPU-Z always need new updated version to solve the wrong detection issue.

As I use 0.09 K8 CPU, what I learn is the performance is similar between water-cooling and air-cooling.
If you need more OC room, you have to use compressors or liquid nitrogen.
The test below is base on water-cooling system and I thought the OC ability is better than 0.13 FX55.


Thereˇ¦re some rumors that AMD will launch 0.09 FX55?
Is it possible that my all software detect incorrectly.
All test software loses the face.
I donˇ¦t think so. At least I trust Everest as it updates so often.

OC a little bit
2866Mhz Performance


2933Mhz


Last year I also test 1 CPU before launched, the date is very new 0.13 939 3800+ ES, but the OC ability is not so good.

If it is the top level product as well, the OC ability is really limited.

Anyway, we still can see some new point.
In normal cooling condition, AMD frequency limitation lever up from 2.7 or 2.8GHz to 2.8 or 2.9GHz.
This is another progress milestone.

All tests are finished now. It brings too many disputes.
I consider returning the CPU to suppress everything.

petervandamned 2nd May 2005 07:05

It's good to see screens of the new king.
keep bringing the OC screens if possible.

But how the hell do you get always the new stuff?

Sidney 2nd May 2005 07:28

The confusion could come from engineering samples and AMD has not released micro-codes to any software detection. Or, the noise is intentionally created by AMD in driving the enthusiasts crazy for awhile before they can produce the chips in large volume.:)


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 17:50.

Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO