Show us what you can get out from it :) |
Come on!!! Come on!!! Main course is coming!!! CPUZ 1.28-6 still cannot distinguish correctly BTW, EVEREST b0320 which update several times per day detect correctly. EVEREST shows Take a photo by DC It exposes my desktop with some many messy files... Finally, itˇ¦s touched CPUZ certification http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=14897 Some abroad test 4200+ San Diego and use CPU-Z 1.27 version is also in a muckˇK http://div.bizcity.ro/article.php?sid=9396 So I just said donˇ¦t post CPUZ. It doesnˇ¦t mean anything. Just shows CPU-Z update is not fast enough... As this CPU is engineering samlpe, I donˇ¦t post the physical CPU photo. I donˇ¦t want to be invited by AMD to drink coffee |
damn, thought they where on 0.9 micron ? you want to send it over ? :) |
cpu-z verifictation still shows the errors though :) I am eagerly awaiting your overclocking results :grin: |
One more software party As you can see, EVEREST updates from 0316 to 0322 in 3 days Thatˇ¦s why he can detect correct information. Socket 939 San Diego E4 SSE3 Japanese CrystalCPUID can distinguish San Diego core and NV technology as well. CPU-Z is really awful, even detect it as Socket 940. As a matter of course 0.13.SH7-B3 and SledgeHammer these kind wrong information. The test below of 4200+ CPU-Z is even worse. http://div.bizcity.ro/article.php?sid=9396 However, I still got the CPUZ certified. Is it possible that I bribe the worldˇ¦s software providers? Is it possible that San Diego + SSE3 + E4 is not FX57? Does AMD have another San Diego product line for FX51, FX53, or FX55? Is that true, as this CPU cannot be reached? Motherboard and BIOS providers may got this CPU for product modification long time ago. One of my best friends who works in Inventec SERVER qualification department got 940 dual core CPU long time ago. He said I was inferior to him that only got E4 stepping not Dual Core one. laugh:^D |
I waste lots of time for boring CPU-Z. Iˇ¦ve been using computer for 6 years and not first time using CPU-Z. Usually, when new CPU coming, CPU-Z always need new updated version to solve the wrong detection issue. As I use 0.09 K8 CPU, what I learn is the performance is similar between water-cooling and air-cooling. If you need more OC room, you have to use compressors or liquid nitrogen. The test below is base on water-cooling system and I thought the OC ability is better than 0.13 FX55. Thereˇ¦re some rumors that AMD will launch 0.09 FX55? Is it possible that my all software detect incorrectly. All test software loses the face. I donˇ¦t think so. At least I trust Everest as it updates so often. OC a little bit 2866Mhz Performance 2933Mhz Last year I also test 1 CPU before launched, the date is very new 0.13 939 3800+ ES, but the OC ability is not so good. If it is the top level product as well, the OC ability is really limited. Anyway, we still can see some new point. In normal cooling condition, AMD frequency limitation lever up from 2.7 or 2.8GHz to 2.8 or 2.9GHz. This is another progress milestone. All tests are finished now. It brings too many disputes. I consider returning the CPU to suppress everything. |
It's good to see screens of the new king. keep bringing the OC screens if possible. But how the hell do you get always the new stuff? |
The confusion could come from engineering samples and AMD has not released micro-codes to any software detection. Or, the noise is intentionally created by AMD in driving the enthusiasts crazy for awhile before they can produce the chips in large volume.:) |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 17:50. |
Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO