EVEREST performance test Memory read test Intel AMD Memory write test Intel AMD Memory data copy Intel AMD Intel AMD Due to the AM2 platform DDR2 multiple limited, DDR2 only run on 737MHz But in EVEREST test, AM2 got better performance then Intel platform with DDR2 800. CPU Queen Intel AMD CPU PhotoWorxx Intel AMD CPU ZLib Intel AMD CPU test, AM2 got better score with higher frequency. We use nForce 570 SLI motherboard, CPUZ also showed the nForce 570 SLI. I wonder why AM2 platform showed the nForce4 SLI ?! FPU Julia Intel AMD FPU Mandel Intel AMD FPU SinJulia Intel AMD On the FPU test, Intel did clear leading position in first 3 of the test. In the last FPU Julia test, AM2 get back some score. In the final: I used some of the popular testing program to have the numbers, Beside AM2 take the lead on EVEREST and Intel got better performance with SuperPI, their performance were equally the same with balanced test result with other software. In my opinion, AM2 can not beat Intel on SuperPI with big range result, in the other test, AM2 could catch up Intel Core 2 Duo series with 350MHz~450 MHz higher, that’s also the frequency difference between AM2 4200+ X2 2.2G and E6300 1.86G. About the temperature, 65nm Core 2 Duo is almost the same temp. with 90nm AM2 procesors between 2~4 degree. This time we got 65W version on AMD 4200+ X2, the code is ADO means 65 W, Intel Core 2 Duo is also 65W refer to the formal information. So they are both the same quality on temperature and watts. Some performance user would like to focus on overclock performance, Intel Core 2 series could have the chance up to 3.6~4GHz, but AM2 just only over 3GHz so far, so lead in 65nm procedure and reduce the watts will be the first priority on AMD side. But for normal DIY computer or local brand PC user, These 2 different dual core platform got almost same performance, consumers should consider more on motherboard, memory and other components combination to consider! I would like to have an entry level dual core platform test all the time, this test review did a little bit late for readers, compare the performance with same price segment CPUs. Most of the dual core products will become vendor’s main benefit income, the only thing we have to consider is cost and performance and what we need to work on for a PC, we don’t need to focus on I or A brand with emotional discuss, just need to take a look on test result and get what you really need on the market! |
Great comparison WindWithMe ;) |
This is the first time I see an AMD X2 beating a Core Duo in so many test :wow: . How about doing some less synthetic test ? Like some 3D benches (3DMark, UT2K4, ...) or some system benches like PCMark ? |
Yeah, AMD beats Intel when it comes to stock performance, but as windwithme already mentioned, with a little overclocking, Intel should do better. Windwithme: Are both mems running command rate 1T? |
I'm all in favor too of Game benchmarks (free Doom3 demo, Half Life 2 Demo, Supreme Commander Beta + Replay Downloads) and Application benchmarks (PhotoShop, MP3/DIVX/WMV encoding) it will give a more down-to-earth comparison; these synthetic benchmarks are "ok" at best, who knows how 7850mb/s in synth. benchmark X translates to real world performance? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 15:56. |
Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO