Madshrimps Forum Madness

Madshrimps Forum Madness (https://www.madshrimps.be/vbulletin/)
-   Hardware Overclocking and Case Modding (https://www.madshrimps.be/vbulletin/f10/)
-   -   3dmarkresultthread-the hunger for more (https://www.madshrimps.be/vbulletin/f10/3dmarkresultthread-hunger-more-135/)

RichBa5tard 12th August 2002 11:05

Quote:

Hi i was comparing scores at madonion and notice you totally beat me even though the hardware seems very close.
Cool, fanmail! :^D

The Senile Doctor 18th August 2002 19:24

the result seen on the orb : 17400 with the radeon 9700 is a NON-overclocked card, but with a fully tweaked OS and a 3.1 ghz cpu @148*4...

RichBa5tard 2nd September 2002 11:48

Playing with a tbred:

Xelo GF4 Ti4200 @ 325|580
TBred XP2200+ @ 10.5*186 (1960Mhz)
KR7A + twinmoss DDR333

=> 13371

5de op de ORB (categorie AMD + Ti4200) :grin:

DUR0N 2nd September 2002 17:08

9.5k with my entrusted setup (overclocked cpu - not to the max) and no overclocking on the vidcard. Some minor tweaks applied

like woheej, i'm going for the fastest duron around ( 11.5k )

jakkerd 16th October 2002 19:24

http://service.madonion.com/compare?2k1=4786520

:)
cpu maxed out at 1600Mhz or 166fsb
so: 166*9.5
g4 ti4200 @standard settings (250/500)

don't feel like pushin my vidcard, i already smoked 2 of'm :D
buh, i'm pretty happy.

The Senile Doctor 27th October 2002 15:43

close to 18k
the vidcard is @ default, and I'm not planning to clock it up atm, the os is untweaked, and the gpusettings are untweaked, it's a fresh xp install.


I got an exactly comparable score with
1. my p4 at 3300 mhz (165 fsb) and ram @ 3:4 div , meaning the ram was doing 220 @ cas 2 3-6-3

2.my p4 @ 3600 mhz with ram @ 2-5-2 cas 2 synchronized @ 180 fsb.


What I mean to say with this is, the very moment we'll have the granite bay on our hands, things are gonna roll pretty fast. Dual channel ddr @ 180 mhz is sure to be... steamingly fast. This should give the p4 so much headroom it'll fly...

AMD needs to get their barton out quickly otherwise the intel prices will stay artificially high... coz the 3.06 will do 4 ghz, and then it'll be over.... coz they'll need changes to the cpu be4 it can scale higher...

Vulk 29th October 2002 07:14

http://service.madonion.com/compare?2k1=4876051

10156
duron1200@1332
gf4ti4200@323/618
256mb ddr
....

My duron must get higher, but he's getting way to hot.:(

RichBa5tard 1st November 2002 23:24

P4 2.53B @ 3.1Ghz (163FSB) & 1.57 vCore
Ti4200 @ 625/580
WinXP, 512DDR Samsung, aggr timings

=> 13752

Just a few hundred points more than my (dead) XP2200+ @ 1.950Mhz. AMD kicks *** :)

3.1Ghz at 1.57 vCore is nice though, If i had a better PSU & mobo this proc would reach 3.2~3.3Ghz easy.

The Senile Doctor 2nd November 2002 07:23

that is simply incomprehensible... can you use the ram @ 4:5, coz 160 fsb @ 200 with some relax on the timings would kick more but, the 3.1 ghz cpu has way too little bandwhith at 326 ddr...

you're chokin' the cpu.


what I've seen is that @ 3350 mhz I have nearly the same score in 3dmark as @ 3600 (ram won't do 3:4 then : 240+ mhz won't go)when I run the ram @ 3:4, the 3500mhz avidly swallows the extreme bandwhith @ 450 mhz ddr even with totally relaxed timings. (can't run 225 @ agressive timings :) )

Vulk 6th December 2002 13:54

11180
duron1200@1365
gf4ti4200@320/622
http://service.madonion.com/compare?2k1=5234940


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:25.

Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO