It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register please click here...

 
Go Back [M] > Madshrimps > WebNews
AMD's 3GHz K10 to break 30,000 3DMark06 AMD's 3GHz K10 to break 30,000 3DMark06
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


AMD's 3GHz K10 to break 30,000 3DMark06
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 30th August 2007, 14:00   #11
Rutar
 
Posts: n/a
Default

And they still didn't calculate it the way I wanted too.


gotta do it myself ><

GPU score of a stock crossfire 2900 setup: 12980

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=2694745

GPU score of a crossfire 2900 setup near INQ clocks: 13080

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=2664231

so we get

CPU score stock: 10787

CPU score overclocked: 16951

A 57% increase. Does boosting the CPU clock increase the GPU scores that much that my results are completely off?
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th August 2007, 14:09   #12
Madshrimp
 
jmke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,021
jmke has disabled reputation
Default

you compare C2D to C2Quad ?
__________________
jmke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th August 2007, 14:33   #13
Rutar
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jmke View Post
you compare C2D to C2Quad ?
Doesn't seem to have an influence on the GPU scores, which is interesting for my comparison as the bigger the CPU effect is on the GPU scores, the less it's worth.
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th August 2007, 14:35   #14
[M] Reviewer
 
geoffrey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 4,127
geoffrey Fully Registeredgeoffrey Fully Registeredgeoffrey Fully Registeredgeoffrey Fully Registeredgeoffrey Fully Registeredgeoffrey Fully Registeredgeoffrey Fully Registeredgeoffrey Fully Registered
Default

My Croffire test on DFI RD600, C2D @ 3,23GHz -> 14579 3D Marks 2006 (http://www.madshrimps.be/?action=get...&articID= 581)

My other 'unofficial' test on P5B Del, CPU @ 3850MHz -> 15644 3D Marks 2006 (http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=620731)

No VGA overclocking with both benchmarks.
No perfect compare, second run is more tweaked for high score, and boards are different too, but with ~ 600MHz higher clocked CPU I got around 1000 extra 3D Marks.

3D Mark 2006 does scale well when you overclock your CPU, though knowing that Conroe allready has a short pipeline I can hardly believe that there is so much more performance left.
geoffrey is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Massman & Petit break 3DMark06 world record with Geforce GTX 260 in SLI jmke WebNews 0 17th April 2009 15:59
3GHz Phenom II to launch at $275 jmke WebNews 0 9th December 2008 11:28
AMD's K10: a "dead" product or not? jmke WebNews 0 13th May 2008 23:48
Belgian Overclockers prepare to break 3DMark06 World Record jmke WebNews 0 3rd April 2008 13:06
AMD's Phenom processors jmke WebNews 0 13th December 2007 14:05
Phenom 3GHz won’t hit 30K in 3Dmark06 jmke WebNews 2 4th September 2007 05:12
ASUS EN8800 Series Scores 10,531 on 3DMark06 jmke WebNews 0 13th November 2006 17:32
AMD's Spansion sets IPO offer range Sidney WebNews 1 5th November 2005 04:18
AMD's 3GHz Athlon 64-FX 'due Q1 2006' jmke WebNews 1 26th July 2005 09:22
AMD's Chip Off The Old Block Sidney WebNews 0 29th July 2004 05:26

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 14:15.


Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO