| ||Thread Tools|
|12th October 2004, 17:00||#21|
Join Date: May 2002
Location: wherever the doom is
fuk yoo all, my pci/agp busses are not locked on that a8v, so fuk yoo all
Where the Reverend is doing his Magick, all mortals be silent
Doom over the world
|12th October 2004, 21:37||#24|
Join Date: Mar 2004
Got rid of the Lian-Li PC65, P4 2.4C system ....
Next rig will be 939 with PCI/PCIe with lock? I have the patience.
Opteron 165 (2) @2.85 1.42 vcore AMD Stock HSF + Chill Vent II
|13th October 2004, 09:59||#25|
The overclocking results are good news if you've got DDR 500 but if you've only got DDR 400 that won't go much over that, what kind of results would you get running the RAM at 80% of FSB speed, ie ram at 400 (or slightly higher), FSB at 250 (or slightly higher). If I've got to ditch my RAM to upgrade and buy even more expensive RAM, it seems to kind of defeat the purpose of overclocking...
|13th October 2004, 10:35||#26|
Join Date: May 2002
? not at all; the memory @ 250mzh is not running at CL2 2-2-5 1T, but at a slower CL2.5 3-3-7
the difference between 200 @ tights timings and 250 @ loose timings, it less then you think
|13th October 2004, 14:26||#27|
The A64 since the mem controller is on cpu doesn't suffer a penelty persay to have ram running non 1:1. In fact, all ram is running asynch to cpu. Sure, higher ram speed will benefit cpu, but only if decent timings used. Read the OCZ article and see what those results showed. As timings had to be loosened, there was a performance loss until HTT could be scaled enough to recover. I run 333 divider in my 754 setup and it's a beatiful system. Given your situation I would not hesitate to run the 333 divider until better ram could be purchased.
|27th October 2004, 16:41||#28|
I really appreciate the great information in your review of the 3200+ 90u. I have been planning a system rebuild for several weeks. Your article came out just as my existing system began to go crazy on me. I was able to get delivery of the Asus A8V deluxe board 2GB of DDR3200 and a Athlon 64 3500+ 90u CPU yesterday. I will spend the weekend in a rebuild.
Thanks again for the hard work on the review.
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|Athlon 64 X2 6000+ 3Ghz 90nm CPU still on track for release||jmke||WebNews||0||25th January 2007 11:39|
|90nm Processors from AMD: Athlon 64 3500+, 3200+ and 3000+||jmke||WebNews||0||29th November 2004 12:59|
|AMD's 90nm Athlon 64 Have Equal Performances to 130nm Chips||jmke||WebNews||2||12th October 2004 00:31|
|In-House: Athlon 64 3200+ 90nm (S939) - The next P4 2.4 "C" ?||jmke||WebNews||0||11th October 2004 16:56|
|Athlon 64 90nm Thermals Part II: Not as Rosy as We Thought.||jmke||WebNews||0||6th October 2004 11:21|
|Athlon 64 S939 90nm 3200+ HOT or NOT ?||jmke||WebNews||4||3rd October 2004 12:01|
|Athlon 64 3000+ Socket 939 90nm: Overclocker's Dream?||jmke||WebNews||0||28th September 2004 11:11|
|Acer Ferrari 3400 notebook with Athlon 64 3000+ 90nm Specifications and Photos||jmke||WebNews||0||21st September 2004 16:49|
|90nm Athlon 64 Winchester Info||jmke||WebNews||2||2nd July 2004 21:23|
|Dead Athlon 64 3200 gets Adjustment||jmke||WebNews||1||23rd March 2004 18:40|