It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register please click here...

 
Go Back [M] > Madshrimps > Articles & Howto's
Athlon 64 3200+ 90nm (S939) - The next P4 2.4 "C" ? Athlon 64 3200+ 90nm (S939) - The next P4 2.4 "C" ?
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Athlon 64 3200+ 90nm (S939) - The next P4 2.4 "C" ?
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 11th October 2004, 18:43   #11
Madshrimp
 
jmke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 78,611
jmke has disabled reputation
Default

look at the timings of the S754 vs S939 though...
__________________
jmke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th October 2004, 19:27   #12
JNav89GT
 
Posts: n/a
Default

yeah eva2000 I could have probably run 1 512mb stick at same timings as the 939 systems. I chose what I though was the best compromise. The 754 setups seem to gain more running at a lower overall ram speed and tight timings vs higher ram speed with looser timings. Either way, it was what I had to work with at the time
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th October 2004, 23:18   #13
Da_BoKa
 
Posts: n/a
Default

a small error

2nd page, superpi calc 1m @ 2.5ghz there is no fx there but 2* 3500+
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th October 2004, 23:29   #14
Madshrimp
 
jmke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 78,611
jmke has disabled reputation
Default

will be fixed tommorow
don't have source files at this location.
__________________
jmke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th October 2004, 04:22   #15
stevedroid
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Good article, just a nitpick but it may confuse quick/lazy readers.

There's a lot of people (myself included) who just go straight to benchmarks. I was amazed that the 3200 was performing better than the FX-53 in some tests and the 3500 in every test. I was just about ready to cancel my 3500 order and get a 3200! Then I actually read the article a noticed you were running everything at equal speeds. That's cool, but any chance you'll upload some comparison graphics for tests at factory speeds? They're useful for doing a price/performance comparison.

By the by, anyone know if AMD will be making a 90nm 3500+?
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th October 2004, 05:18   #16
YoDaddyOG
 
Posts: n/a
Default

hello all. i just joined your forum for this article. i was wondering how easy it is to overclock the 3200+. i'm a total noob when it comes to overclocking. but i know what i'm going to buy for the system. what do you think about these specs.
asus a8v rev 2.0
3200+
ocz pc3200 plat rev 2.0 512mb(another 512 next month)
some case
either enemax or thermaltake 420maybe 480w psu.

i'm wondering if you can tell me if i would be able to hit 2.5ghz first attempt with those parts. also can you mention how to overclock step by step. if it's not to much trouble. atealst some links for a64 ocing.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th October 2004, 13:35   #17
JNav89GT
 
Posts: n/a
Default

too complex to go into right here I'm afraid. I was thinking of writing a comprehensive A64 oc'ing article. Maybe I'll pursue that a little more.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th October 2004, 13:52   #18
kristos
 
Posts: n/a
Default

personally, i'd buy a dual channel kit instead of buying 1stick now and 1stick a month later. They'll probably both work in dual channel, but you might end up with one stick that clocks better then the other (although you can have this with dual channel kits aswell).

I'd also go for a different PSU, just because of prejudice tagan is very good and not expensive brand I believe they also produce the OCZ PSU's, not sure of this though).

I don't have any experience with A64 so here's a guide: http://www.dugu9tweaks.net/guides/a64oc/
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th October 2004, 13:55   #19
Madshrimp
 
jmke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 78,611
jmke has disabled reputation
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by YoDaddyOG
. atealst some links for a64 ocing.
should get you started: http://www.dugu9tweaks.net/guides/a64oc/index.html

edit: duh Kristos already posted this
__________________
jmke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th October 2004, 15:43   #20
[M] Reviewer
 
Sidney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 15,739
Sidney Freshly Registered
Default

the [M] version on step by step OCing A64 is a good idea.
__________________
lazyman

Opteron 165 (2) @2.85 1.42 vcore AMD Stock HSF + Chill Vent II
Sidney is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Athlon 64 X2 6000+ 3Ghz 90nm CPU still on track for release jmke WebNews 0 25th January 2007 10:39
90nm Processors from AMD: Athlon 64 3500+, 3200+ and 3000+ jmke WebNews 0 29th November 2004 11:59
AMD's 90nm Athlon 64 Have Equal Performances to 130nm Chips jmke WebNews 2 11th October 2004 23:31
In-House: Athlon 64 3200+ 90nm (S939) - The next P4 2.4 "C" ? jmke WebNews 0 11th October 2004 15:56
Athlon 64 90nm Thermals Part II: Not as Rosy as We Thought. jmke WebNews 0 6th October 2004 10:21
Athlon 64 S939 90nm 3200+ HOT or NOT ? jmke WebNews 4 3rd October 2004 11:01
Athlon 64 3000+ Socket 939 90nm: Overclocker's Dream? jmke WebNews 0 28th September 2004 10:11
Acer Ferrari 3400 notebook with Athlon 64 3000+ 90nm Specifications and Photos jmke WebNews 0 21st September 2004 15:49
90nm Athlon 64 Winchester Info jmke WebNews 2 2nd July 2004 20:23
Dead Athlon 64 3200 gets Adjustment jmke WebNews 1 23rd March 2004 17:40

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 23:01.


Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO