Aircooling @ the MAX, Performance & Silence Tested Quote:
thanks again TerAngreal for the great support during testing & the great write-up afterwards! |
:ws: VERY usefull, it contains all the important info needed AND keeping it short enough :ws: |
w00t excellent article :ws: |
Quote:
I don't remember seeing any PIV's around in the year 2000. :-) |
http://www.swiftnets.com/products/mc462.asp =) correct as can be! Quote:
|
thanks for the feedback guys! @ D@ Hitch: Intel's "history of innovations" places the Pentium IV processor in the year 2000 as well ... that does not imply it was available on the open market at that time yet, but it sure means there had to be an Intel reference board for the Pentium IV. |
hmm, very curious towards the update... will the slk900 overtake when used with a 92mm fan?? |
my guess: yes, it will ... but only by a mere 1°C or so an 80mm fan just doesn't cool down the entire SLK900, where it does for the SLK800 |
nice work. |
i've got a Volcano 7 + enermax casefan Temps @ my xp1800 Tberd A : Load: 34° , Idle 30° (sometimes 29°) Really nice article! Very handy imo. :super: |
yah, this is a great article..... but.... i've really been searching the reviews to find which cooler works best under a low speed fan: such as a panaflow 12volt at 24 CFM. So far, i'm convinced that the PAL would work best... but... the article only tests a fan blowing from the side which gives the other coolers a disadvantage, especially the SLKs since their air-oulets are only horizontal, not like the swiftech or the PAL, which go in all directions. Hope someone can give me a predictions which one would be better in a situation where a 24 CFM fan was mounted on top of each heatsink. Thanks. -- i'm building a SILENT SILENT SILENT PC! =) |
watercool it |
the SLK900 will perform best overall, the way the copper is shaped + a 92mm fan will allow for the maximum heat to be quickly removed , thereby keeping your CPU cool as crisp :) |
Anyone who knows what's the reason of my high temps by accident ? :-) /mod: sorry for the offtopic-level of my post, but since most of the ppl that are interested SLK800/900 will read this topic, AND with the reason for my suspections about my system due reading that article, I came to the idea of proposing my problem here. Excuse me once more btw. |
47°C in a case with 1.9v through a Duron core is not THAT high in my humble opinion |
Quote:
Thx btw. |
I'm wondering which is the best PIV cooler. The options are: Swiftech MCX-4000, Alpha pal 8942 (nevermind about that, isn't the best anyway or SLK-900 And 'cause you guys have got all these coolers, i thought maybe you'd know wich one would be THE best cooler. But you guys tested it on AMD :( Should it be possible to test it on a PIV together with the swiftec? I'd appreciate that very much, and I guess I'm not the only one Tnx on advance, Bored |
we "got" is indeed the correct word we don't have them anymore :/ but we have some other things also for P4 lined up :) |
Can u tell what u think the best cooler is? It mustn't be one of those i mentioned, i just want TEH UBERLEETEST PIV heatsink ;) And I have allready ordered a 120mm papst @80 CFM, which i will combine with a fanadapter. PS: is it possible to fit the adapter on the SLK-900? |
depends on the adapter :) the AMD produces alot of heat @ 2v vcore seeing as the SLK900 is also at the top of the performance list, you can be sure it is quite good for your P4 http://www.overclockers.com/articles373/ for P4 Cooler Master IHC-H71: 0.16 |
Is that coolermaster really better :| I cant believe it, i thought the titans were MCX 4000 and SLK-900 Its the see-trough blue adapter @loveno Well, thanks anyways |
I can't find the coolermaster anywhere :( I only saw a ICh L71 |
as you can see, the Alpha PAL8942 is worse then the Coolermaster.. but the Alpha is beaten by the Swiftech in my review -> http://www.madshrimps.be/gotoartik.php?articID=37 so Swiftech/SLK will surely be top quality |
I know, but what is THE TOP :'( I'm wondering about that for months now, and i haven't find an answer yet, @ telenet.games they say: thermalright slk900, and if I ask why: cuz its something different then what the others have :s What a statement :s Btw, @ www.overclockers.com, what does the C/W number mean? |
Quote:
which is not much, so can't go wrong either way :) Quote:
|
Quote:
|
you're quoting from an AMD article my man :) Intel has higher threshholds :) |
So what :D I guess the swiftech is more compatible with a fanadapter, and i guess it won't fit on the thermalright, but i allso have a 92mm fan from my dell PC, which DOES fit on the slk, but with a much lower airflow as my 80CFM papst I just want to squeeze every last megahertz out of that p4 1.8 (the one with 256 cache, williamette i believe :() I bought 2 40mm fans to mount on my rimms (should be bottleneck to OC i think, but they perform pretty well) and a 80mm to put on my graka (on top of it) or to combine with a zalman 80a hp in the future |
yeah the thermalright slk800u is very good. i just received it and still testing the stability on my P4 with the intel stock cooler and running @ 100% load i got a temp reaching to 56°C. Overclocked to 2983mhz it was 62° (way to much) I don't have any temps yet with the slk800U but i'll put em online soon |
thank BDke! If you're interested I can throw together a small article with your experiences of the SLK800U, send me an email if you want to help us out :) jmke@madshrimps.be thanks in advance! :super: |
Aalraajt. BDke has installed his SLK800U with a 80mm YS-tech cooler. Difference between the intel stock cooler is that the SLK800U is very heavy and looks awesome. I'll post some test results. Intel Stock Cooler Idle - Not oc'ed -> 42° - Oc'ed (2.53@2983) -> 55° 100% Load during 10 minuts - Not oc'ed -> 55° - Oc'ed (2.53@2983) -> 63° Thermalrigh SLK800U with YS-tech 80mm Idle - Not oc'ed -> 38° - Oc'ed (2.53@2983) -> 41° 100% Load during 10 minuts - Not oc'ed -> 45° - Oc'ed (2.53@2983) -> 52° All test are runned with a Intel P4 2.53 on Asus P4PE. During overclocking the fsb went to 158mhz and Vcore @ 1.625v ROCKSTABLE. Now my P4 is running @ 2850mhz without touching the Vcorce (1.5v) ROCKSTABLE!!!!! While oc'ing with the intel stock cooler I had to use 1.650v cause it wouldn't run stable enough. This is a small user experience with the SLK800u. Questions? just ask :) |
did you use the same compound for both heatsinks (with other words: not the thermal pad) ? |
I used the same compound yes. It's low budget. I got it from a friend but i am going to buy some arctic silver soon. The temp may drop some more. And then i'll put 3*120mm papst fans in my case for an optimal airflow and i hope that will cool of the cpu as well :) |
great results, comes to show the SLK800 is worth its money if you put it to good use like you did :super: thanks for your input BDke! |
np dude :) |
I'm a little confused, does my Swiftech MX-462 still stands it ground, or is it become oldfashion and I should change cooling? |
if it still stands ground, why bother spending money on something you don't need? buy something else instead and purchase a new cooler when needed :) |
ok, i'm going to buy a new cooler. Now i have a zalman with a amd xp 2000+ (palomino :( ). I had to lower my Vcore (now 1.675) because of the temps (now - normal use with folding- cpu: 58°). i don't know which HS to buy. I doubt between a slk800 or slk900. Is the difference big between a slk800 and an slk900u (with zalman fan deliverd with my old cooler - CNPS6000CU ) |
another advantage or ... SLK800 to SLK900 blowing air through fans doesn't blow hot air towards grafix card with 800 and does with 900 casefan comes more handy with 800 than 900 on the other hand 900 blows wind towards PSU with fan on bottom but hey we use a backcasefan , don't we! |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:24. |
Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO